Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: The Trillion-Dollar Conspiracy: 9/11 Mounting Evidence [View all]William Seger
(11,031 posts)... is not the same thing as "swallow(ing) whole the 'official story'," and (2) you have yet to explain why you think the 28 pages have anything to do with controlled demolition bullshit. Attack a strawman, try to change the subject, toss in a gratuitous insult, and you're finished, huh?
But okay, since you don't want to discuss controlled demolition bullshit -- and I don't blame you -- yes, I'd love to see these 28 pages. Why don't you tell me where I can read them, and I'll come back and tell you what I think. Sorta hard to discuss them without doing that, don't you think? So far, I can't even figure out what the heck you trying to say about them: You deny the "official story" yet believe that that part of the "official story" is true? And if it's true, then you believe that Saudi support of the 19 radical Islamist terrorist hijackers also supports the theory that it was a BushCo inside job, with magical explosives? What are you trying to say, exactly?