Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Caretha

(2,737 posts)
26. Now that's a lie
Sun Oct 26, 2014, 08:04 PM
Oct 2014

This will be my last response to you until you do some honest responding to me.

But regarding your latest bald faced lie about seismographs ...here you go.

http://911review.com/errors/wtc/seismic.html


SEISMIC "SPIKES"

Seismographs at Columbia University's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, New York, 21 miles north of the WTC, recorded strange seismic activity on September 11 that has still not been explained.

While the aircraft crashes caused minimal earth shaking, significant earthquakes with unusual spikes occurred at the beginning of each collapse. The Palisades seismic data recorded a 2.1 magnitude earthquake during the 10-second collapse of the South Tower at 9:59:04 and a 2.3 quake during the 8-second collapse of the North Tower at 10:28:31.

The Palisades seismic record shows that -- as the collapses began -- a huge seismic "spike" marked the moment the greatest energy went into the ground. The strongest jolts were all registered at the beginning of the collapses, well before the falling debris struck the earth. These unexplained "spikes" in the seismic data lend credence to the theory that massive explosions at the base of the towers caused the collapses.

A "sharp spike of short duration" is how seismologist Thorne Lay of Univ. of California at Santa Cruz told AFP an underground nuclear explosion appears on a seismograph.

The two unexplained spikes are more than twenty times the amplitude of the other seismic waves associated with the collapses and occurred in the East-West seismic recording as the buildings began to fall.


Now about your none credentials ...naa, don't bother - you are a waste of time.

Bye


Thanks for posting this newfie11 Oct 2014 #1
" I hope people investigate before blowing this info off" William Seger Oct 2014 #2
Post removed Post removed Oct 2014 #3
you're the one bought the BS! wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #5
I did investigate and am now blowing this bullshit off. zappaman Oct 2014 #4
LOL, OK, nt Logical Oct 2014 #35
This is my first trip to the CS group. zeemike Oct 2014 #6
Thank you zeemike. wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #7
Yes I have been checking some of them out. zeemike Oct 2014 #8
they've been counting on that. wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #9
The truth is that we all see the same thing. zeemike Oct 2014 #10
exactly! well said....n/t wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #11
Both towers collapsed from the aircraft impact zones cpwm17 Oct 2014 #14
Do you believe Caretha Oct 2014 #19
Do you believe in "cause and effect?" William Seger Oct 2014 #23
That response Caretha Oct 2014 #24
"they heard explosions long before the buildings fell" William Seger Oct 2014 #25
Now that's a lie Caretha Oct 2014 #26
Good grief. You didn't even read your own source William Seger Oct 2014 #27
Oh now the truth movement is interested in credentials? AZCat Oct 2014 #32
the truth movement is yes! wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #38
that is totally fucking ridiculous! wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #28
The undamaged part of the towers below cpwm17 Oct 2014 #29
"No explosives were heard during the collapse. That's a fact." wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #30
No explosives were heard in any of the recordings in any collapse cpwm17 Oct 2014 #31
the video I posted proves explosives were heard...and... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #33
many people heard explosions..... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #34
It's not just that some can't think about what might have really happened... nationalize the fed Oct 2014 #12
Orwellian indeed. zeemike Oct 2014 #13
"and running away from actual debate" William Seger Oct 2014 #15
Blah Blah nationalize the fed Oct 2014 #16
So, asking questions and ignoring answers is your idea of a "debate?" William Seger Oct 2014 #17
Just because you're terribly impressed with yourself nationalize the fed Oct 2014 #21
Suit yourself William Seger Oct 2014 #22
If you had evidence, you'd be talking about it. nt greyl Oct 2014 #18
And what a shock it is no one has come out and leaked any of this conspiracy. Nt Logical Dec 2014 #54
This is an excellent documentary. Thx for posting. nationalize the fed Oct 2014 #20
You honestly are so off base that I think you will believe.... Logical Oct 2014 #36
you really should dismount that high horse... wildbilln864 Oct 2014 #37
How do the deniers explain WTC tower 7? Quantess Nov 2014 #39
The deniers explain it as a controlled demolition William Seger Nov 2014 #40
wrong! wildbilln864 Nov 2014 #41
The singular purpose of the "truth movement" is to deny the "official story" William Seger Nov 2014 #44
Some people don't believe believe in fairy tales gyroscope Nov 2014 #45
You want to go there? Do you have an explanation Quantess Dec 2014 #50
So, you deny the "official story" William Seger Dec 2014 #52
Yet you swallow whole the "official story" even though YOU don't know what it is nationalize the fed Dec 2014 #53
Calling bullshit on controlled demolition bullshit William Seger Dec 2014 #55
obviously over your head Seger... wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #56
"Path of most resistance" - that's good. AZCat Dec 2014 #57
do you not understand the meaning of it AZ? wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #58
Oh I know what you're trying to convey. AZCat Dec 2014 #59
explain why/how it's amusing please? wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #60
Except the explosions were not silent gyroscope Nov 2014 #42
Oh yeah, the magical delayed-action explosives William Seger Nov 2014 #46
What are you babbling about? gyroscope Nov 2014 #48
"sounds like incoherent ramblings of a mad man" William Seger Nov 2014 #49
You are making the guy work hard for his money. Quantess Dec 2014 #51
Magical fire! gyroscope Nov 2014 #43
If you work in a building designed like WTC 7 William Seger Nov 2014 #47
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»The Trillion-Dollar Consp...»Reply #26