North Tower Exploding...

[gyroscope]

22. Asking for a real world example

is a strawman is in your universe? I don't know where you are from, but here on earth science is conducted with real world testing and experiments not just theories and ridiculous claims. it can't be called science if you can't prove it.


This is science:

The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1] To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning.[2] The Oxford English Dictionary defines the scientific method as "a method or procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses."[3]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method




This is non-scientific hocus pocus voodoo aka the NIST report:

NIST official FAQs
22. Did the NIST investigation look for evidence of the WTC towers being brought down by controlled demolition? Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues?

NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel.

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm


See the difference?