Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,031 posts)

8. I've noticed that most "truthers" are hypocrits

Reply to johndoeX (Reply #7)

Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:59 AM

Jun 2014

Your lack of understanding of basic engineering principles is not my problem. I already asked the FAA if the conditions in FAR 25.305 were limit or ultimate and the answer was limit. Same thing from two professional forums. Limit loads are multiplied by a factor of safety, per FAR 25.303. Period. What's the "score" now? I've proved my claims, while you've haven't done squat to even attempt to do the same. How about you pay me that imaginary 50 bucks to try one more time to convince you?

When are you going to stop playing games and at least try to support your claims?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

William Seger - Epically Fails - Again [View all] johndoeX Jun 2014 OP

Maybe Billy is SIGDEV nationalize the fed Jun 2014 #1

Cult-leader wannabes are usually paranoid delusional egoists (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #4

Pilots for truth can't source structural failure speed of a 767 - failure again superbeachnut Jun 2014 #2

Beachy - do you agree with this person? johndoeX Jun 2014 #9

Sorry, Cap't Bob, but I have an unimpeachable source. William Seger Jun 2014 #3

Spin, obfuscate, deflect. johndoeX Jun 2014 #5

ROFLMAO William Seger Jun 2014 #6

When are you going to email the FAA with your claims Seger? johndoeX Jun 2014 #7

I've noticed that most "truthers" are hypocrits William Seger Jun 2014 #8

The only thing you have proven.... johndoeX Jun 2014 #10

No, I don't, and having to repeat myself so many times is really annoying William Seger Jun 2014 #12

"Uh, no I shouldn't if he's wrong. And he is.".... johndoeX Jun 2014 #13

Is that a "never?" (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #15

quote mine, who cares what the real defintion is, pilots for truth can find a quote to say otherwise superbeachnut Jun 2014 #16

BTW, is "EagleEye" one of your socks on your own forum? William Seger Jun 2014 #11

No he isn't me. johndoeX Jun 2014 #14

LOL, I don't recall even thinking about you since your last disaster here William Seger Jun 2014 #17

Hmmm... johndoeX Jun 2014 #18

U mad, Bro? (n/t) William Seger Jun 2014 #19

Actually... johndoeX Jun 2014 #21

A more recent face with a name William Seger Jun 2014 #22

lol... nice johndoeX Jun 2014 #23

Thanks William Seger Jun 2014 #24

"Thanks for the bump"? johndoeX Jun 2014 #25

You do know that SOME people will read past the OP, right? William Seger Jun 2014 #26

Of course - johndoeX Jun 2014 #27

Oh, by now, I know who your target market is William Seger Jun 2014 #28

pilots for truth make personal attacks on those murdered on 911 by speading lies superbeachnut Jun 2014 #20