William Seger - Epically Fails - Again

[superbeachnut]

2. Pilots for truth can't source structural failure speed of a 767 - failure again

767 designed to be flutter free up to 1.2 times maximum design dive speed (Vd)
Flight tested on 911 by terrorists who can hit large targets (unlike pilots for truth who say they can't do it) at speeds past Vd.

RADAR and Video prove a 767 does not fall apart at high speed. Pilots for truth lie about impossible speed.

pilots for truth say...

"Vd is the end of the flight envelope on all aircraft (small and large), regulated by the FAA. Period."

That is not what...
Wait, another photoshopped Vn/Vg diagram...
From the Illustrated Guide To Aerodynamics. and photoshopped

Why did you photoshop the diagram.
From the Illustrated Guide To Aerodynamics. As is.

What does your source say about Vd, aka the book answer -
From the Illustrated Guide To Aerodynamics. Talking about Fig. 5-27

It says structural failure could occur, not will. There goes the impossible speed.
Your impossible speed lie dies again.
Do you read your sources before spreading lies? Why did you lie about the ATP?

Oops Flight 175 impacted the WTC at 1.2Vd. Looks like pilots for truth make up fake limits to support their failed fantasy of impossible speed. Flight 77 was over Vmo for 20 seconds, never got to 1.2Vd, but was over Vd, and kept flying. Pilots for truth proved wrong twice on 911.

Fake Vg diagrams, and failed 11.2g math.
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/easyjet-737-incident-debunks-pilot-for-9-11-truth-v-g-diagram-video.3160/page-7
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=188863
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html


Why did you photoshop the diagram?