Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)

16. You complained when zappaman didn't respond to the alledged evidence in your truther video

Reply to Richard Charnin (Reply #11)

Mon Dec 19, 2011, 03:48 AM

Dec 2011

But you refuse to respond to any evidence I presented in my responses to your video.

You've been taken in by a group of pseudo experts. All of the demolition experts in the US disagree that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. The actual scientists and engineers in the US support the findings of NIST.

You don't need to consult any expert to see that your pseudo experts are full of shit. In fact they are liars. It's as plain as can be. That's why you refuse to respond: because it's too uncomfortable for you to see evidence that contradicts your truther fantasies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

9/11 Theories: Expert vs. EXpert [View all] Richard Charnin Dec 2011 OP

I certainly hope you have contributed to this very important cause! zappaman Dec 2011 #1

I have contributed...by posting the video. Richard Charnin Dec 2011 #2

uh zappaman Dec 2011 #3

But you have still not specifically addressed the "bits and pieces..nt Richard Charnin Dec 2011 #4

There was a lot of BS there cpwm17 Dec 2011 #6

The contradictory claims were made by the defenders of the official conspiracy theory. Richard Charnin Dec 2011 #7

Acutally Bolo Boffin has done a nice job in the past... AZCat Dec 2011 #8

The contradictory claims are truther strawmen cpwm17 Dec 2011 #9

No need for me to respond. Richard Charnin Dec 2011 #11

I'm not sure why you think architects and engineers... AZCat Dec 2011 #14

NIST's Twin Towers report is only half a report. Ace Acme Oct 2013 #21

"No need for me to respond." Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #15

You complained when zappaman didn't respond to the alledged evidence in your truther video cpwm17 Dec 2011 #16

Richard Gage is lying to you William Seger Dec 2011 #10

Are 1643 architects and engineers and thousands of others lying also? nt Richard Charnin Dec 2011 #12

You guys just had a White House petition that only hit 111! Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #13

Apparently, Gage can be fairly convincing... William Seger Dec 2011 #17

Once upon a time the entire college of cardinals Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2011 #19

Thanks. That's a good debunking of goofball NIST "evidence" (nt) T S Justly Dec 2011 #5

Do you apply the same rigorous standards of inquiry... SidDithers Dec 2011 #18

Thank you for posting this video! wildbilln864 Dec 2011 #20