Last edited Wed Jun 25, 2014, 12:24 AM - Edit history (1)
"they" -
"they don't do this on other websites to defend democratic policies. They don't jump in threads to defend any other topics. Their only actions here are to denigrate those of us who want a real and full investigation of 911 and the perpetrators. No where else do they spend so much time and effort. Why is that." - wildbilln864.
No one saw explosives, no one was injured by explosives. A fact quote mining can't change.
The full investigation into 911 is complete, 19 terrorists did 911 with four aircraft. Talk of explosives, are wild unsupported lies - why? there is no evidence for explosives on 911. Only 4 planes, 19 terrorists.
Lack of knowledge of the many investigations does not merit a new investigation. There were no bombs in the WTC, that is a failed fantasy.
Which topic needs defending? Why do people spread lies recycled from 911 truth, a failed movement.
19 terrorists, 4 planes, no explosives, no thermite, now what -
"tries for almost ten years to make you doubt all the many witnesses that saw, heard and were injured by explosions before and after the plane impact. Around the clock & every day. Something's up! Listen to the witness at 48 minutes in." - wildbilln864
... what is the around the clock stuff? sounds paranoid
Repeating failed claims will not help after 13 years.
Why does 911 truth quote mine witnesses out of context? No one died from blast effects.? Why zero blast damage to 911 steel? - 911 truth has hearsay, thinks it is evidence, failed to make a point.
= new reply since forum marked as read