Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Skygate 911 [View all]superbeachnut
(381 posts)Your last paragraph is so silly, meaningless, there is no way pilots for truth can recover and explain what you made up. Pilots for truth have no clue what they are talking about when it comes to aerodynamics.
Pilots for truth failed claims fool less than 0.1 percent of all pilots. The delusional claims have no base in fact. Ironically, pilots for truth claim they offer no theory, yet make ridiculous claims based on ignorance and nonsense.
Pilots for truth lie about the g force for 77 to hit the Pentagon, and say it would take 34g, after posting 11.2g made up by waving hands rapidly and failing to make sense.
http://www.cesura17.net/~will/ephemera/sept11/balsamo/balsamo2.html
Oops, the final G force for 77, and pilots for truth over 30gs off. oops
The FARs the 767 were made under have aircraft flutter free at 1.2Vd, thus the speed of 580mph should be flutter free, and all the planes on 911 did not suffer the fake structural failure, and there is no such speed as structural failure for a 767. Pilots for truth use the fake Vg diagram to fool people with the fraud claim plane can't fly faster than Vd. A lie.
http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=188863
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/debunked-the-role-of-aeroelastic-flutter-in-the-events-of-9-11.3359/
Where is you ATP, why have you never flown left seat heavy jets?
Oops, I have no clue those are Boeing jets, the same as the one I was flying, left seat and taking the shot. What did mav say...