Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Skygate 911 [View all]johndoeX
(268 posts)26. Whoops, I missed this one.....
Seger says - "....you are in effect asserting that Vmo is the speed at which "limit" loads are calculated and Vd is the speed at which "ultimate" loads are achieved..."
Notice your constant use of the word "loads" when referring to airspeed limitations.
I am not "asserting" as such. And I have continually attempted to help you understand that you are confusing limit load "Factor Of Safety" (which is 50%), with airspeed margins of safety.
load
noun \ˈlōd\
: something that is lifted and carried
: an amount that can be carried at one time : an amount that fills something (such as a truck)
: the weight that is carried or supported by something
Source - http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/load
(my emphasis above)
Now for a basic ground school lesson taught on the first day....
(just a quick google image search I did)
These are some of the very problems you had when attempting to debate a topic such as Mcrit. You just do not understand the language/terminology.
Would you argue with a 15 year old in high school who is trying to tell you how to be a "draftsman"? That is what it is like arguing aerodynamics with you. It's a waste of time.
Feel free to donate 30 dollars to P4T for this lesson. Unless of course you think Merriam-Webster is also wrong and the diagram provided by langleyflyingschool.com is "fake"?
Seger says - "But yes, I did find FAR 25, so you will need to be more careful about simply asserting what is says"
Anyone can find FAR 25, but it is clear you are unable to find the relevant "flutter-free" FAR under Part 25. Because if you did, you would understand it does not apply to an aircraft which is changing altitude and speed... ie. maneuvering.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
177 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jetblue Captain and Aeronautical Engineer falls for Skygate 911 lies and fake Vg diagram
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#71
math expert debunks pilots for truth math, pilot for truth forum thread confirms it
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#44
pilots for truth fail to decode what a mathematician can, so much for experts
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#48
Fake Vg diagram, inability to post the structural failure speed - pilots for truth
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#53
Why can't the super pilots for truth source what they say they can source
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#77
pilots for truth talk Technobabble with aerodynamics and can't explain their dumb-speak
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#81
Where is the core, why do they not help spread lies of impossible speeds, and fake Vg diagrams
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#111
pilots for truth unable to state the structural failure speed on their fake Vg diagram
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#43
Fake Vg diagram supported with... nothing, pilots for truth fake Vg diagram supports lies about 911
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#60
sign of no evidence, for lies of "structual failure at 425 KEAS", and fake Vg diagram, flying a desk
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#88
How does this save the fake Vg diagram or the structural failure speed lie
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#55
Paranoid conspiracy theorist fall for pilot for truth fake Vg diagrams and other lies
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#65
paranoid conspiracy theorist post more lies and paranoia instead of evidence
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#67
A fake Vg diagram appears in the Skygate video with the lie of structual failure at 425 KEAS
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#78
pilots for truth make fake Vg diagram and explain how to fake the Vg diagram, without engineering
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#86
Pilots for truth can't find the spec the 767 was built to, a reflection of their fake 767 Vg diagram
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#129
Seger, are you familiar with real world exercise, practical application, and precedent?
johndoeX
Jun 2014
#134
Fake speeds, fake Vg diagram, failed physics, what is the next fake claim from pilots for truth
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#132
To any person with a WORKING brain SOMETHING IS TERRIBLY WRONG WITH WHAT WE'VE BEEN TOLD ABOUT 9/11.
dballance
Jun 2014
#158
More nonsense sponsored by pilots for truth, more hearsay and exageration
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#171
Working brain? You fell for lies in the "The Big Bamboozle", you were Bamboozled
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#168
pilots for truth can't defend impossible speed lie, no support from rational Aero Engineers
superbeachnut
Jun 2014
#176