Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: North Tower Exploding... [View all]Ace Acme
(1,464 posts)Already-broken windows? Broken by what? How come so many of them are in the center of the wall?
Vents? You mean HVAC ducts? "Puffs" of air strong enough to break windows would break apart the ducts first.
I never said the pulverized concrete was an indication of demolition. I said it was one of ten essential mysteries
of the collapses that NIST dodged.
There's no need for silent explosives once a collapse is in progress. The din of the collapse masks the sounds of
explosives.
Who has accurately analyzed how much kinetic energy was available and how much the structure could absorb?
NIST claims they did not analyze the collapses.
The energy requirements of pulverization of the concrete may have been computed by Dr. Greening. Dr. Greening
gets no credit in the NIST report of which I am aware, nor are his findings AFAIK incorporated in the NIST report.
How do we even know that a paper featured at a propaganda website called 911myths is even Dr. Greening's
work? I want an official, reliable energy budget for the collapse. Pdfs from propaganda websites are not good
enough for democracy.
You haven't given me any sound reasoning to dismiss. Your sources are not reliable and your handwaving is silly.