Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)

1. Bingo

Reply to jakeXT (Original post)

Wed Nov 27, 2013, 12:48 AM

Nov 2013

Why blame the Saudis if you want to invade Iraq? Unless it was actually the Saudis that did 9-11 and there was no Bush administration MIHOP conspiracy.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Our favorite left gatekeeper on 9/11 [View all] jakeXT Nov 2013 OP

Bingo cpwm17 Nov 2013 #1

What makes you think Saudis doing it means no MIHOP? Ace Acme Nov 2013 #3

If you move goalposts and invent new CT's cpwm17 Nov 2013 #14

I'm not inventing any CTs. I'm just demolishing your bogus and unintelligent certainties. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #15

Chomsky did a good job of showing how nonsensical the popular 9-11 CT is cpwm17 Nov 2013 #16

Chomsky only showed his own nonsense Ace Acme Nov 2013 #18

How did 9-11 go down and what's your evidence? cpwm17 Nov 2013 #21

Try evaluating the logic instead of the source. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #23

Chomsky makes sense; you do not William Seger Nov 2013 #22

Your points 3,4,5, and 6 are compleat nonsense. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #24

Thanks William Seger Nov 2013 #25

In your dreams. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #28

"Demolishing" what? William Seger Nov 2013 #17

There is no contradiction between your postulated purpose of a MIHOP op and the use of Ace Acme Nov 2013 #19

Chomsky a "left gatekeeper" ?! William Seger Nov 2013 #2

So Chomsky is not a lefty? That's a silly thing to say. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #4

So Chomsky is a "gatekeeper?" That's an absurd thing to say. (n/t) William Seger Nov 2013 #5

It's not at all absurd. He says JFK and 9/11 are of no interest Ace Acme Nov 2013 #6

No offense, but it could be that Chomsky is much smarter than you William Seger Nov 2013 #7

Maybe, and maybe not. The jury's still out on that. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #10

It's not at all absurd. He says JFK and 9/11 are of no interest Ace Acme Nov 2013 #9

I thought the label is common knowledge and nothing new jakeXT Nov 2013 #8

"Common" among "truthers" perhaps William Seger Nov 2013 #11

His claim is "Even if it were true...who cares" /nt jakeXT Nov 2013 #12

That doesn't make him a "gatekeeper" William Seger Nov 2013 #13

His reputation as an anti-authoritarian is what makes him an effective gate-keeper. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #20

Ah! Brilliant! William Seger Nov 2013 #26

I didn't say that. Ace Acme Nov 2013 #27