Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
2. You are comparing apples to oranges.
Fri Dec 16, 2011, 06:31 PM
Dec 2011

First of all, Matthias Rust "invaded" Russian air space.

The planes that hit the Twin Towers were not invading American air space. They were part of it. They were commercial jet that took off from airports inside the USA.

And once the first plane hit the tower, our senior NORAD officials knew of the fact that the two planes had gone off course. FAA Director Jane Garvey made sure that the airlines' lines into the FAA were made open and available to the senior military, starting within minutes of the FAA realizing that the first plane was hijacked (Approx 8:35 Am the morning of Sept 11th.) But some officials assumed the second plane was part of an ongoing "military game" that was set up and was in operation at the time.

When I listened to Nine Eleven Commission testimony, that was presented live on C Span while occurring, the military officials talked about this.

Many of us, including me, do think that the plane that went down in a field in Pennsylvania was targeted by our military. Nothing else explains the way that the plane's total material, including bodies of passengers, was basically evaporated.



Not applicable - U.S. officials had a Security advisory stating attacks by airliners were imminent.. T S Justly Dec 2011 #1
Imminent where? n/t Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #3
You're asking the wrong department. (nt) T S Justly Dec 2011 #6
You are aware the United States is a rather large place? n/t Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #7
NORAD, Bolo. Or Richard Meyers. They were aiming our guns, then. (nt) T S Justly Dec 2011 #8
"Security advisory stating attacks by airliners were imminent" -- your words. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #9
It is your "imminent where" the Joint Chiefs and NORAD, et al had the duty to know or surmise ... T S Justly Dec 2011 #10
Do you even have a source for this belief of a security alert? Link? Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #11
I don't like to be pressed or squeezed ... T S Justly Dec 2011 #12
Well, don't post what you can't back up and you'll not have that problem. n/t Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #13
Get a dog, Bolo. Not only can you order it around ... T S Justly Dec 2011 #15
I would never even think about kicking a dog, T S Justly. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #16
Well, then, I'll kick this dog (nt) (nr) T S Justly Dec 2011 #18
Tell Bolo this BeFree Dec 2011 #21
Why don't you tell me yourself? Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #22
The US was the target BeFree Dec 2011 #23
Yes, and as I pointed out above, BeFree Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #24
I asked you a simple question BeFree Dec 2011 #25
I refuse to participate in your smear tactics. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #26
No. bushco is not innocent BeFree Dec 2011 #27
What is Bushco? n/t zappaman Dec 2011 #29
At least nine PDBs from April to July had titles warning of al Qaeda attacks. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #30
The Soviets had all damn day to shoot down Rust RZM Dec 2011 #4
The Conspirators had 31 days to ready a response to ... T S Justly Dec 2011 #14
KAL flight 902 was shot down in 1978 over the USSR. Ace Acme Dec 2013 #31
You are comparing apples to oranges. truedelphi Dec 2011 #2
It is apples and organges, I admit that RZM Dec 2011 #5
Your logic doesn't follow... CJCRANE Dec 2011 #17
That's not how the Soviets usually operated RZM Dec 2011 #28
I did think it was interesting to reflect on Rust and his attempt to truedelphi Dec 2011 #19
I'm not sure, actually RZM Dec 2011 #20
The differences among detection, interception, and shootdown are distinctions Ace Acme Dec 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Regarding the 'heaviest d...»Reply #2