9/11 Free Fall 7/18/13: Dr. deHaven-Smith and "conspiracy theory"

[Ace Acme]

40. You're changing the subject from column access to collapse initiation.

Last edited Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:29 PM - Edit history (1)

You change the subject a lot--when you're forced to yield on a fact, you try to make the fact seem irrelevant. It's not. You claimed that the FACT that the core columns were accessible from the elevator hoistways is "truther bullshit".

I showed that you're wrong, and you changed the subject to where did the collapses begin and a completely evidence free claim that the loss of the 16 core columns accessible on the 95th floor would not cause the core to collapse.

Your own diagram shows 13 core columns in the elevator shafts (and 3 more in practical proximity) at the 95th floor.

Down lower, as you acknowledge, there were more elevator shafts and more thorough access.

Truth-seekers try to establish the facts first before analyzing them. Propagandists like you labor to fit the facts to your analysis, and to disqualify inconvenient facts.