Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Debunked: "Molten Metal" Explained [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I asked for evidence of molten steel and you referred me to Astaneh's photos. There is no evidence for molten steel running anywhere in those photos.
There is no evidence beyond a few people stating they saw, interchangeably, molten metal or molten steel.
No photos. No samples.
Well, one alleged sample that hasn't been proven in any way.
So stop referring people to Astaneh when they ask for evidence of slagged steel that can create a fucking stalagmite, that must run, and drip.
The only evidence you have offered is the opinion of a few humans whose eyes are not spectrometers capable of differentiating between molten steel or molten aluminium at a glance. People who may have made assumptions. People who may have repeated other people's assumptions.
That's before we even get to the possibility of molten steel having to do with the collapse, even IF some was found in the wreckage.
Edit:
"How many hundreds of hours have you spent posting about 9/11?
And yet you never had the curiosity to research the molten steel evidence yourself? "
And you can drop that 'you haven't researched XYZ' bullshit you keep coming up with. I've done plenty, but there's nothing here TO research. They are empty allegations without evidence. Period. Insubstantial. I'd be doing 'research' on the molten steel reading a paper on the fallibility of human perception/memory.