Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Debunked: "Molten Metal" Explained [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)76. Basic chemsitry. Gypsum board is CaSO₄·2H₂O
Diesel fuel? You don't think that simulates the events in the rubble pile, do you? Even the JP8 (Kerosene, not Diesel) was consumed, or mostly consumed before the collapses.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
263 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Um, perfectly reasonable that some windows would be blown out and not others.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2013
#21
"air handling systems of the two towers had interconnections in the basement..."
gyroscope
Jul 2013
#22
And as I mentioned earlier, no thermite or thermate is visible burning in the building during
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2013
#40
Actually, good sized demo projects often have water sprayed on the rubble for some time.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2013
#50
What kind of metal do you think they were talking about when the claims of molten metal were made?
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2013
#57
Most of the eyewitnesses on film say 'molten metal', not 'molten steel'.
AtheistCrusader
Jul 2013
#59
Actually, the remains of the metal itself demonstrates it adequately for me.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#89
Yes, because you are using 'melted' deliberatedly when the correct word is eroded or corroded.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#113
Tell me, what does a POOL of molten metal that is 'vaporized' look like?
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#124
You deliberately conflate 2 separate accounts to create false contradictions nt
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#130
Pools of molten steel was a topic of this thread fork, if you scroll up, before you barged in.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#155
I have looked at that photo you linked, plus the ones I provided, and about 10 more that neither of
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#159
Slagged steel is the intermediary step between steel beams and the alleged stalagmite
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#171
The evidence of a steel stalagmite is the NYT article written by a PhD astrophysicist
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#174
Astaneh's photos do not show material that could have produced an alleged stalagmite.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#200
Not my job. It's Jones's job to establish that it is real, and bring it to sources that can
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#211
He hasn't provided what he purports to be the only phyiscal pieces of evidence
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#216
So contact Jones and prove that he CAN'T produce the sample of the melted iron.
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#220
I refer you to post 161 in which you claim slag running down channel rails.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#198
Captain Philip Ruvolo, FDNY, claims molten steel running down the channel rails. nt
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#203
Which of course, humans can detect the chemical composition of with the naked eye.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#205
Generally untrue, with a couple narrow exceptions; tells that are not present
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#212
It's been several years since I read that part, which is buried deep in the third volume
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#77
Dr. Astaneh's opinions about truthers are irrelevant to the fact that he saw melting of girders
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#85
Those photos aren't 'not good enough' they are not of the same thing at all.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#96
Those photos are of partially melted steel girders and partially evaporated steel girders. nt
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#97
Look at the "Material Recovery Report" by Professor Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl, fig 10 photo nt
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#127
It does, if you intend to show dripping beams, pools, stalagmites, etc.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#133
Then why did you jump into this thread fork which was previously about items like
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#138
If you haven't seen the pictures years ago you must have been hiding under a rock.
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#143
No, I'm looking for evidence that supports the OTHER claims you referenced.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#248
There is an alleged sample, unproven 12 YEARS after, zero photos and a couple allegations.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#250
The "alleged" samples are pictured in FEMA Appendix C and have been seen on BBC TV.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#251
'melted' in the manner you showed doesn't produce running channels full of molten steel or stalgmite
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#252
I asked for evidence of steel that could produce the alleged stalagmite for which
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#254
I provided the evidence. Eyewitness testimony from Captain Philip Ruvolo, FDNY,
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#255
NIST doesn't prove their theories. Their core steel samples do not show heating
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#257
Your demands for proof are disingenuous when you do not demand proof from NIST.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#259
Eyewitness testimony is evidence. Your efforts to deny that would get you laughed out of court.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#263
My mistake. One Reaper drone costs $30 million. Or a Chinook helicopter. Sue me.
Ace Acme
Oct 2013
#149
I spend my time arguing with creationists. You're welcome. If not, their bullshit would be in textbo
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#172
You have provided zero facts, and nothing but unsubstantiated allegations.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#179
5 PHD's that offered no evidence, and no means by which they identified the allegedly
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#183
Yes, there is a need for it. Because without it, you have no evidence beyond Glanz's claim
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#195
There are no photos or samples that link steel beams to a steel stalagmite.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#213
The stalagmite hasn't been established AS steel. The beams do not show the type of melting that
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#219
If you'd ever cut steel with any heat source, you'd know the self-evident answer to that question.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#231
Clearly you have not, or you wouldn't be pretending that the beam resembles
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#233
Keep pretending. I would too, if I was invested in an idea and boxed into a corner.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2013
#235
I'm pointing at photos that show melted steel. "Slagged" is your phony specification,
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#240
You're showing eroded beams that have no connection whatsoever with a stalagmite.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#241
A lie. Produce the assay of Dr. Jones claim of 'formerly molten ingot'.
AtheistCrusader
Nov 2013
#245
There is nothing false about my analogies. They illustrate the flaws in your reasoning.
Ace Acme
Nov 2013
#246
It is insulting to use the epithet "conspiracy theorists" on almost every text panel.
BlueStreak
Oct 2013
#109