Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,031 posts)

5. No jest, and don't call me Surely

Reply to Ace Acme (Reply #4)

Wed Oct 23, 2013, 10:07 PM

Oct 2013

Last edited Wed Oct 23, 2013, 11:12 PM - Edit history (1)

The video claimed to be showing that the NIST hypothesis was impossible, but the actual NIST hypothesis does not include any supposition that the flange collapsed when the web went past the edge of the seat plate. It's ironic that elsewhere you accuse others of "straw-man arguments."

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Shear Ignorance NIST and WTC7 [View all] JohnyCanuck Oct 2013 OP

The farce is strong in this stuff Kennah Oct 2013 #1

Whoever is behind this series of videos..... JohnyCanuck Oct 2013 #2

Really? William Seger Oct 2013 #3

Surely you jest Ace Acme Oct 2013 #4

No jest, and don't call me Surely William Seger Oct 2013 #5

Omission of the stiffener plate provides a fudge factor Ace Acme Oct 2013 #6

"Fudge factor" is a good description of your dodge William Seger Oct 2013 #7

When you see a pattern of secrecy and dishonest omissions in an investigation Ace Acme Oct 2013 #8