Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 9/11 Debunked: "Molten Metal" Explained [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)collapse. Not even on the enormous nearly football-field sized chunks of the building literally tossed aside, exposing the interior.
Do you imagine nanothermite doesn't burn brightly? Does it have a nano-cloaking shield? Why don't we see any explosions propagating through the building behind the infamous enormous section of tower 1's north wall that physically impacted WTC 7?
Are these nano explosives fucking INVISIBLE? Explode without concussion?
You're just waving a magic wand here, you know that right? You don't understand how mechanical kinetic forces EXPECTED to be present in that form of collapse can pulverize concrete, so you reach for a deus ex machina that you don't understand, and hope it'll FUD up the discussion enough for you to pretend you are winning.
Not a chance. WTC 1 & 2 were pulverized from the impact points downward, by purely mechanical forces brought on by a sudden failure of the outer supports.
Tell me, what magical nano explosive SUCKS the outer walls INWARD at the floor where the fires are hottest, letting them snap just prior to the collapse? Those outer walls are half of the tube-within-a-tube support core of the building. It cannot physically stand with just the central core supports intact. Once the outer supports fail, total systemic collapse is inevitable.