Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
22. What plane?
Sun May 5, 2013, 09:23 PM
May 2013

Last edited Sun May 5, 2013, 10:02 PM - Edit history (1)

<a href="http://imgur.com/i0mBqyb"><img src="" title="Hosted by imgur.com"/></a>


I found this on a video that caught my eye. The reason it caught my eye was I felt the "plane" went in too fast. Then I slowed it down, and got this. This makes sense since in ALL 9/11 photos, there are NO seats. Would explain the "flash" we see before impact. A homing devise would be the flash. Say what you will, a plane would of had resistance at some point upon impact. There may have even been a wing sheered off, but that doesn't happen as we all know.

Picture NOT photo shopped. I could barely crop it as you can see. I have NO talent when it comes to trickery if you will. I even had to take a picture with a camera from the video to get this. This is just what I happened to catch one day of the many years I have been watching these videos. I know it sounds crazy and all, and I can't explain every detail of 9/11, but I have spent more time studying it than the original 9/11 "terrorist" and even I would have taken off from JFK that day, than fly a hijacked plane over military bases. But that's just me. How about you? Years in the making, but no box cutters foils your attack. Laughable to say the least.

No. Not weird at all. ocpagu Apr 2013 #1
That makes as much sense as everything else related to the "truth movement" William Seger Apr 2013 #3
My point... ocpagu Apr 2013 #6
Ah. William Seger Apr 2013 #7
Sigh... ocpagu Apr 2013 #8
I see... William Seger Apr 2013 #9
Of course you don't. ocpagu Apr 2013 #10
Not by coincidence, we've been discussing that nonsense here for years William Seger Apr 2013 #11
I won't even waste my time. ocpagu Apr 2013 #12
Well, "obviously," whoever planted the part William Seger Apr 2013 #13
What makes you think it's rope? AtheistCrusader Apr 2013 #14
Or maybe... William Seger Apr 2013 #16
How is it "obvious" it was planted? zappaman Apr 2013 #17
How is it weird? cpwm17 Apr 2013 #2
it's a large part wedged in a weird spot and just found now? NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #4
related article here NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #5
For reference, here's where it was found William Seger Apr 2013 #15
the weird parts are NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #18
If "it was found in such a tight place" William Seger Apr 2013 #19
I think we can safely say the part didn't fall into that little gap originally NoMoreWarNow Apr 2013 #20
'I think we can safely say the part didn't fall into that little gap originally" zappaman Apr 2013 #21
What plane? Politicalboi May 2013 #22
Two things William Seger May 2013 #23
yes, I'm not really sure what happened NoMoreWarNow May 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Large 9/11 Plane Part Jus...»Reply #22