Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]OrwellwasRight
(5,210 posts)That is just insipid. Also, I have laid out my evidence, you and your pal have laid out yours. You have not convinced me. I have not convinced you, nor have I tried. What more is there to "discuss"? It seems to have devolved into:
"It's not opinion about the Dictabelt. Or where Kennedy was shot from. Things like that are not negated by your opinion of them."
In other words, just saying that my evidence sucks and yours doesn't. If my evidence is "not credible" and only yours is, how in the world can you think there is anything to discuss? There isn't. That's not productive. Nor is it discussion. Nor is it even seemingly aware that there are many books and documentaries and first hand accounts and official government reports that do support these and other bits of evidence that indicate a second shooter.
for what I hope is the final time, I have done my own reading and thinking and disagree with you and your buddy.
So feel superior or whatever, but quit trying to convince me. You won't.
And you also apparently lack the capability to be able to agree to disagree, which I would think would be a necessary prerequisite for a forum entitled "creative speculation."