Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]eomer
(3,845 posts)His countenance may reflect guilt of something, but guilt of what? It may have been guilt of knowing he played some part but at the same time realizing that, as he claimed, the part he played was the setup patsy, either with or without firing some of the shots.
Similarly with the other 52 "reasons" - what are the various possible explanations that fit all the evidence, not just a cherry-picked selection of 53 points of evidence that say what you would want to show? Showing that Oswald played a part and performed certain acts does not rule out other conspirators playing parts as well.
I probably won't be back to debate any responses, just don't have the mental strength to engage in it right now. So I'll just say that in my opinion the totality of the evidence points to a conspiracy in which the CIA (or some rogue faction thereof) had some involvement. Please proceed with whatever rebuttal you want, my point will still be that and I'll likely just leave it at that, thanks for your indulgence.