Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: Bugliosi: 53 Reasons It Was Lee Harvey Oswald [View all]alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Thanks for all these as well. I understand that it is the combination of points that one must read in the aggregate. I'll have a response to the whole when you're done posting. For now, I'm just going through and registering my reaction to each one, since part of the prosecutorial cumulative strategy is for each one to also be a little conviction in itself. I'm just noting those that don't speak to me. Notice that there are much more that I haven't commented on! (It's why I think Oswald did the shooting and acted alone)
Here again, whatever the fact of his work might have been, some people just change after work, especially in physical labor fields. It becomes habit. His action is just as consistent with somebody who is a) a little freaked out because the President just got killed (near his work, and he's a guy that had defected to Russia!) and b) thinks he has the rest of the day off from work. The changing of the clothes and putting a light jacket on just falls flat as "consciousness of guilt" evidence. Some of the other stuff is stronger, of course.