Here's a correction OP for 50 Reasons, 50 Years OP

[arguille]

36. reply to #31

The CIA claimed to have absolutely no interest in Oswald - even though they indeed should have.

The cover-up in New Orleans centred around the fact that Oswald was frequently seen in the company of right wing figures with intelligence backgrounds and connections, specifically based in the office of Guy Banister.

The cover-up in Mexico City was based on multiple "Oswald" appearances at the Cuban Consulate and Russian Embassy, visits which seemed to indicate he was desperate to get a visa to visit Cuba. The CIA lied to say none of their surveillance equipment was working when "Oswald" made these visits. However, a tape recording of an "Oswald" telephone call to the Russian embassy - a call that seemingly linked Oswald with a purported KGB "assassination expert" - was heard by FBI agents who declared that the voice was not Oswald's. This same recording, and its transcript, had been hidden for seven weeks and then sprung on the day of the assassination to tie the President's alleged killer with the Russians and the Cubans. But it was an imposter. Why was an imposter linking Oswald to the Russians and Cubans seven weeks before the assassination?

The CIA's pattern of lies, deceptions, and imposters becomes extremely curious in light of the provable fact that Oswald was framed for the assassination of JFK. The CIA, a large organization, may not be ultimately responsible, but people associated with the Counter Intelligence office consistently over many years displayed guilty knowledge.