Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,031 posts)

72. Oh, by the way, I see now that you are correct

Mon Mar 18, 2013, 08:42 AM

Mar 2013

> I, however, didn't "shit on him and his story".

Rereading your posts, yes, I see that you explicitly denied that it was worth the effort:

> Your problem is that (a) you came up with a who-gives-a-shit story...

My apologies for misunderstanding what you were getting at.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

76 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dallas Morning News: Gary Mack and the evolution of a JFK conspiracy theorist [View all] Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 OP

Thank you zappaman Mar 2013 #1

I have searched for these "conspiracy cranks " Frosty1 Mar 2013 #2

The first time I ever visited the 6th Floor Museum.. MicaelS Mar 2013 #3

The first time I visited the 6th floor museum... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #4

Again with the "ear witness" stuff William Seger Mar 2013 #5

Couple of things, Bill... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #6

Looks more like a couple of nothings, Mom William Seger Mar 2013 #7

Talk about wasting you keyboard skills... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #8

"Point me to any one of those videos..." William Seger Mar 2013 #9

Couldn't find one, huh? William Seger Mar 2013 #12

Please don't cry, Bill MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #14

No problem. William Seger Mar 2013 #18

You understand you are kicking my post about a reformed conspiracy theorist? Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #21

Whatever exposes the truth... matters not BB MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #22

Kick! n/t zappaman Mar 2013 #26

There's a PARKING LOT BEHIND THAT FENCE. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #10

Good point William Seger Mar 2013 #11

Not to mention all those people you can see looking back at the TSBD in the films used here Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #13

Enter mcadams... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #16

It's got nothing to do with McAdams William Seger Mar 2013 #17

HA! MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #15

Nah, they'd naturally decide to do a suicide rush on the shooter William Seger Mar 2013 #19

OK, fine! All those folks are bugging up there to catch them a second shooter. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #20

"That would fit the facts, woodunit? MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #23

Maybe the second shooter got beamed up, then? Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #24

Maybe you could continue to give credence to your belief... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #27

Yes, I agree that a second shooter up on the grassy knoll is silly and hilarious Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #30

You would... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #32

Feel free to explain how the second shooter got away any time now. n/t Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #33

That's the argument of the absolute... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #34

If there was a second shooter, he got away. How? Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #35

I'll bet a lot of people got away... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #36

You can't answer because there is no answer that doesn't expose you to ridicule. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #37

I can only answer real questions... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #39

How did the second shooter escape? That's a real question. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #40

Episode Six: "Jim DiEugenio discusses a strange visit..." William Seger Mar 2013 #54

You apparently make an argument... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #56

"All of this testimony strongly suggests..." William Seger Mar 2013 #57

reply to #54 arguille Mar 2013 #74

"represents quite a bit more than the 'nothing' you think it does" William Seger Mar 2013 #76

I'll take that bet. zappaman Mar 2013 #38

I was fortunate to visit it once and it immediately struck me that Oswald was a dumbass... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #25

Heck, the photo supports what you said, if nothing else. MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #28

No, the "real perps" were the dumb asses William Seger Mar 2013 #29

No, actually, they were the smart ones....Oswald DID get blamed for something he was perhaps only... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #42

You're just assuming the consequent. William Seger Mar 2013 #43

Ah, I shouldn't believe my lying eyes... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #46

Well, first, I'd suggest actually USING your eyes William Seger Mar 2013 #52

reply to #52 arguille Mar 2013 #73

Uh.... huh? William Seger Mar 2013 #75

And if he'd tried to shoot then, everyone would have seen him do it. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #31

I'm sorry but that isn't even remotely logical... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #41

Sweet Jesus. At the very least, the Secret Service would have. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #44

"At the very least, the Secret Service would have." zappaman Mar 2013 #45

He ran because he knew he was being set up... truebrit71 Mar 2013 #47

He ran because he had just assassinated the President of the United States... Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #48

...except he had done no such thing.. truebrit71 Mar 2013 #49

...except he had... Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #50

That's difficult to understand because it doesn't make any sense William Seger Mar 2013 #53

According to the OP, Gary Mack "now believes Oswald was the only gunman that day." AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #51

Yes, that is correct. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #55

Re-read what was posted at #51, not your interpretation of the story referred to in the OP. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #58

I'm sorry, but it's you that has the problem with reading comprehension. Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #59

No. Your problem is that (a) you came up with a who-gives-a-shit story, (b) you interpreted what AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #60

Thank you for your concern. n/t Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #61

That's what you can expect, AM... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #62

Have we a bet yet? zappaman Mar 2013 #64

What does that tell me? In my experience, liberals are open minded, are willing to consider facts, AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #65

To ignore a mockingbird... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #66

Is this yet one more snide DU-rule-skating insinuation that I am not a liberal and in league with Bolo Boffin Mar 2013 #67

+1 zappaman Mar 2013 #68

Gary Mack... MrMickeysMom Mar 2013 #63

"Even if the statement in the OP were true..." William Seger Mar 2013 #69

It is enough that you misrepresent what I've said. You've changed the subject. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #70

Well, that particular comment was really addressed to... William Seger Mar 2013 #71

Oh, by the way, I see now that you are correct William Seger Mar 2013 #72