Conspiracy v. fact 9/11

[tomk52]

24. Are you kidding?

Argument? We haven't gotten close to an argument, yet.

About 2/3rds of Politicalboi's statements were simply incorrect. I either corrected them, or provided obvious clues as to where he could find out the truth himself.

Once he gets his facts straight, THEN we can start a discussion.

Likely, it won't be necessary at that point, because with correct facts, virtually all of his questions evaporate.

Kinda like over on the "Martin Sheen 9/11 Questions Unanswered" thread, when you claimed that Anders Bjorkman was "a peer" of Zdenek Bazant, and had the slightest chance of being capable of debunking Bazant's papers. And then I set you straight about their comparative expertise in structural engineering. And the discussion ended, due directly to the presence of actual facts.

Not that your ego would let you acknowledge any of that, of course.
But we all knew, anyway.