Martin Sheen: 9/11 Questions 'Unanswered,' Building 7 'Very Suspicious'

[William Seger]

72. Nothing that you can admit, obviously, but that's hardly the issue

We seemed to have reached a point where every "debate" with "no-planers" seems to lead: You've got nothing left except denial, but willful ignorance is your impenetrable defense. You are as willfully blind to the scientific facts as you are to the plane debris. But as John Adams observed, "Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence."

I think we've beat to death your inability to find "enough" plane debris or solve the Mystery of the Missing Wings and Tail, but I'm really amused that you can defend Gourley and even Bjorkman (who is a complete idiot, if not mentally ill).

I challenge you to prove my first paragraph wrong by telling me in your own words any one of the objections to Bazant's analysis that either Gourley or Bjorkman raised, tell me Bazant's reply, then tell me what's wrong with it.

If you're not willing to even attempt to do that, I think I'd be justified to stop wasting time replying to you.