Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: 911: Window of Exposure [View all]William Seger
(10,923 posts)27. But if I'm the last one to post, then I win?
Your argument was challenged many posts ago as being fallacious, for rather obvious reasons. If you can't either attempt to explain why it isn't fallacious or attempt to fix it or just replace it with an argument that isn't fallacious, then there's nothing left to debate. Apparently, the best you can do is reassert it, but you think I am the one who is unable to argue?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't expect much outcry when attempts are made to steal this election, either.
dixiegrrrrl
Sep 2012
#5
So, your proof of conspiracy is that Rumsfeld adhered to a course of action that YOU determine
MercutioATC
Sep 2012
#8
But I did "argue against it" and all you could do was reassert the same dubious premise
William Seger
Sep 2012
#19
No, if you're just going to keep repeating the same faulty argument, let's stop
William Seger
Sep 2012
#23
Every single point you raise is speculative, "I think this is what would have happened"
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#52
Not only have I done the homework, I'm former military (US Air Force) I understand this a lot better
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#54