Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: The best evidence against a 9/11 conspiracy? [View all]MercutioATC
(28,470 posts)25. I'm an air traffic controller of 21 years
I take this issue seriously.
I've posted numerous explanations of the inner workings of the air traffic control system in the past and I believe that the real travesty is the need for some to use this tragedy to promote their own private conspiracy theories.
What happened on 9/11 was horrific and was, in part, due to the failings of a system that had never seen this kind of attack. Those issues have been largely rectified and we now have a safer system. To suggest that there was an air of passivity or intent on the part of the people who have pledged to keep our fellow Americans safe is unconscionable.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That is evidence only that the powers that be have controlled information well enough . . .
freedom fighter jh
Sep 2012
#6
There's only one standard for what constitutes a "valid" logical inference
William Seger
Sep 2012
#17
But, of course, a valid logical inference is not the standard in a criminal case.
eomer
Sep 2012
#23