Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Creative Speculation

William Seger

(11,460 posts)

1. Hmm.... I guess the "fascinating" part must have been at the end?

Reply to BeHereNow (Original post)

Sun Mar 18, 2012, 09:50 AM

Mar 2012

I didn't make it quite that far. Hulet doesn't believe bin Laden was involved because he doesn't believe bin Laden was involved. Baker kept saying reasonable-sounding things about investigating carefully before jumping to conclusions, so one has to wonder why he's talking about 9/11 apparently without having done so. Wells is just kinda annoying, IMO. All in all, I think Bigfoot hunters would have been more fascinating.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just came across a fascinating radio broadcast- John B. Wells hosting [View all] BeHereNow Mar 2012 OP

Hmm.... I guess the "fascinating" part must have been at the end? William Seger Mar 2012 #1