OK then. Just the facts. 9-11

[cbrer]

39. You were able

to find that inconsistency, where I was not. Logical conclusions require tools as any other analysis.

I wasn't throwing around a damned thing. You made some sort of statement that insinuated I was pulling this data out of my ass, when in fact I was studying computations from a guy with a physics degree. To me, a physics degree IS a big deal. Lends credibility. Never said it was the be all/end all. Not trying to one up anybody. I am obviously unqualified personally to do so.

But all this crap obscures the fact that I'm just seeking information. It seems you have some kind of problem with that. When did seeking information (qualified technical) become such an object of derision? Because I see pausibility in the notion that our government might be telling us the whole truth surrounding those events? Crazy of me I know. So if you can't provide data without ridicule, or talking down to then WTF? This is all so far off the subject, that wading through it obfuscates the objective.

Thank you for your contributions to this point, if you have more data that can help a non-physics qualified layman understand those events better, come on with it. Acting like I'm trying to throw around stuff is baseless, and unproductive.