Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: OK then. Just the facts. 9-11 [View all]cbrer
(1,831 posts)27. He states that it's in the video.
And again, I believe I have a rudimentary understanding of the issue. It seems that his evidence of constant acceleration means that there was nothing there to slow them down when they collided. If that's true, a whole lot of matter had to have been moved out of the way quickly. Or else impact between the upper and lower blocks would have produced a reduction in acceleration.
Is a constant acceleration AKA "free fall"?
I can't watch the video. My location has a crap connection. Demolition with no explosives? Sounds intriguing. What gives?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"... is shown to have been in constant downward acceleration until it disappeared."
William Seger
Feb 2012
#26
For someone who claims to be curious, why have you not read any critical analysis of this POS?
jberryhill
Feb 2012
#35