Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zappaman

(20,607 posts)
8. "Who knows if it did or not "
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 09:12 PM
Jan 2012

Really?
I guess you are a "no-planer" then.
Didn't know any were still around.

If a plane didn't hit the pentagon...
-Lamp posts downed by plane impact: faked
-Generator damage by engine impact: faked
-Boeing parts on the ground and inside the building: faked
-Impact hole cutout in the Pentagon matching a 757-sized jetliner: faked
-Recovered DNA identifying Flight 77 passengers and crew: faked
-Recovered victim personal effects provided to family members: faked
-All witnesses to the plane impact: plants or confused about what they saw
-tree branches and leaves shorn off at the overpass by flight 77's engine and seen strewn about the highway amongst the downed lamp posts: faked
-the missing foot peg and impact scar on the VDOT camera pole: faked
-The genset trailer damage pushed TOWARD the direction of the pentagon face: faked

All that was faked, eh?

Maybe you should read up on FDRs and black boxes.
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2009/07/misinformation-flight-77-flight-path.html

Oh, and can you provide a source beyond YouTube that this is an "official" animation.

There's also about 12 witnesses who say 'the plane' flew North of the Citgo gas station antitsa Jan 2012 #1
Which is consistent with the NTSB flight path gyroscope Jan 2012 #2
Yes, the official Pentagon story is pure bunkum. nt antitsa Jan 2012 #4
which part is "pure bunkum"? zappaman Jan 2012 #5
'77' didn't fly that day Rosa Luxemburg Mar 2012 #46
It didn't? zappaman Mar 2012 #47
so, what is it you are getting at? zappaman Jan 2012 #3
Who knows if it did or not gyroscope Jan 2012 #6
"Who knows if it did or not " zappaman Jan 2012 #8
I know you love putting words in people's mouths gyroscope Jan 2012 #10
sorry zappaman Jan 2012 #12
I don't know what hit the Pentagon gyroscope Jan 2012 #14
"but what kind of aircraft is the question." zappaman Jan 2012 #16
... ocpagu Jan 2012 #42
I speak for billions zappaman Jan 2012 #43
No. ocpagu Feb 2013 #48
billions...with a "b". n/t zappaman Feb 2013 #49
You wish ocpagu Feb 2013 #54
Poster apparentely accepts that a FDR can be dummied up and inserted into the wreckage AtheistCrusader Feb 2013 #60
Sometimes participants in evil conspiracies do thing to sabotage those plots Ace Acme Oct 2013 #63
Then why don't we SEE a clear video of the crash Politicalboi Mar 2012 #44
"The Pentagon should have a lot of camera's that should have recorded the crash" zappaman Mar 2012 #45
Of course... ocpagu Feb 2013 #50
But they didn't. n/t zappaman Feb 2013 #51
Thank you Captain Obvious! ocpagu Feb 2013 #55
Your fallacies William Seger Feb 2013 #53
Yeah, sure. ocpagu Feb 2013 #56
From whence do you derive your intimate knowledge of the surveillance systems at the Pentagon? Ace Acme Oct 2013 #64
and for some reason the aa defences faild that day. Prog_gun_owner Mar 2013 #62
Looks like a plane imo Callmecrazy Feb 2013 #52
I should add gyroscope Jan 2012 #7
Oh, I see zappaman Jan 2012 #9
That appears to be the case gyroscope Jan 2012 #11
oh, really? zappaman Jan 2012 #13
The source is provided in the OP gyroscope Jan 2012 #17
Oh, PILOTS FOR TRUTH is the source? zappaman Jan 2012 #18
So according to you gyroscope Jan 2012 #20
actually, there have been some good discussions of this OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #21
So according to you zappaman Jan 2012 #22
That wasn't the question gyroscope Jan 2012 #25
If you "don't dispute that something hit the Pentagon" then... William Seger Jan 2012 #32
The flight recorder data shows otherwise gyroscope Jan 2012 #34
based on what evidence? OnTheOtherHand Jan 2012 #40
What?!? William Seger Jan 2012 #29
So what do the incomplete data blocks show? gyroscope Jan 2012 #33
You have a bad habit of digging your holes deeper William Seger Jan 2012 #35
Not necessarily gyroscope Jan 2012 #36
"the FDR continuing to record after impact" ? William Seger Jan 2012 #39
IMHO, that's the best part of this whole line of argument jberryhill Jan 2012 #41
One other big problem gyroscope Jan 2012 #37
You didn't even read the post I linked to William Seger Jan 2012 #38
This has been discussed before zappaman Jan 2012 #15
I see no mention of the flight data recorder gyroscope Jan 2012 #19
It isn't 2006 anymore William Seger Jan 2012 #23
Does DU have a rule against posting threads about Flight 77? gyroscope Jan 2012 #26
I think he was helpfully pointing out zappaman Jan 2012 #27
Thats your opinion gyroscope Jan 2012 #28
His is an INFORMED opinion William Seger Jan 2012 #31
He's an "informed opinion" for you. ocpagu Feb 2013 #57
For me too. And for most people who've gone through this madness in 2006. Democracyinkind Feb 2013 #58
I'm always surprised that there isn't a better video than the one's posted on Youtube or wherever. FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #24
The footage they did release gyroscope Jan 2012 #30
Not releasing the videos accomplishes two things Ace Acme Oct 2013 #65
Wouldn't the wing hitting the light pole at 500 mph sever the wing and cause it to crash any way? Prog_gun_owner Feb 2013 #59
Define "long" sgsmith Feb 2013 #61
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»American 77 flight path d...»Reply #8