Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Creative Speculation
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]jberryhill
(62,444 posts)23. Okay, so we agree on the overall synopsis
Perhaps you might offer some details of which you are aware, to fill out the general outline of "the plane hit the ground at high speed".
I agree with you that, beyond that, there are likely many details.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I didn't speculate about whether it was "reasonable", just affirmed there was no NTSB report
SlipperySlope
Jan 2012
#5
You're about halfway there. Which part struck first? What happened afterward? nt
antitsa
Jan 2012
#6
OK, then, your "allegedly" sounds like a "I've already made up my mind, thanks" kinda "allegedly"
OnTheOtherHand
Jan 2012
#14