This message was self-deleted by its author

[OnTheOtherHand]

3. there is also a flight path study for 93

antitsa complained that the Specialist's Factual Report was tough sledding -- and it is.

The Flight Path Study can be obtained via this link.

From approximately 10:00 to 10:02 there were four distinct control column
inputs that caused the airplane to pitch nose-up (climb) and nose-down (dive)
aggressively. During this time the airplane climbed to about 10,000 feet while
turning to the right. The airplane then pitched nose-down and rolled to the right
in response to flight control inputs, and impacted the ground at about 490 knots
(563 mph) in a 40 degree nose-down, inverted attitude. The time of impact was
10:03:11.

antitsa's questions aren't very clear, so it's hard to know how to address them.

ETA: As slipperyslope points out, the NTSB didn't do a regular accident report. "The airplane then pitched nose-down and rolled to the right in response to flight control inputs" provides a clue about the apparent cause of the crash.