Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Make7

(8,547 posts)
3. I think there are functions that only Hosts can do that are beneficial.
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 03:26 AM
Dec 2011

For example, pinning threads for discussing group related topics would be useful, sort of like the Please read thread at DU2-September 11.

Also blocking obvious trolls/disruptors from being allowed to post at all will probably be needed at some point.

What if we decided that for this group any Hosts related action could not be taken unilaterally, but would require some minimal form of a consensus? We could even limit it to just two Hosts, but they would have to agree before acting. Hopefully we could all agree on at least two people to Host in a reasonable manner.

Unfortunately not a lot of people frequent the DU2-Dungeon anymore, but I hope some will find it more productive over here at DU3 and visit more often. I think eomer would be a good candidate for being a Host, but I'm not sure if he's around enough should there only be two (or very few) hosts. Someone else that seems like a reasonable choice would be OnTheOtherHand - and he seems to check in quite frequently. There should probably also be some agreed to method to remove hosts if the group members feel they are over stepping their bounds.

Or, thinking as I type this, perhaps we should just have a single Host that simply serves as the person who acts as a representative of the group members. For example, votes could be held whether or not to block someone from (or reinstate them to) the group and the Host would simply enact whatever the result turned out to be.

There are a lot of possibilities on how to run a group. I have no issues with having a few hosts from different perspectives using their best judgement while using the Host position as it seems to be set up by the Admins, but I was usually not the one having issues with how the DU2-Dungeon was moderated.

What would be helpful to getting things off to a good start over here would be to get the input of people that found the DU2-Dungeon unfair. If people really want a place for more productive discussions, it shouldn't be terribly difficult to come up with some agreement on how to proceed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If we cannot decide on a permanent host, we'll need to ask an admin to unsticky the threads on top Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #1
Not in my opinion. nt Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #2
I think there are functions that only Hosts can do that are beneficial. Make7 Dec 2011 #3
Hi, I'm here. eomer Dec 2011 #11
Well, it still remains to be seen how the conversations develop here. Make7 Dec 2011 #26
I could see Grateful for Hope as a permanent host. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #4
Hi Bolo Grateful for Hope Dec 2011 #12
I think you both would make good hosts maddezmom Dec 2011 #13
Of course if either Lithos or undergroundrailroad (or both) were to put their hats into the ring Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #5
that sounds like a great idea maddezmom Dec 2011 #22
I think it's too early to be certain. greyl Dec 2011 #6
Oh, definitely. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #9
I think this group needs a few hosts maddezmom Dec 2011 #7
Yeah, when/if the time comes, at least 6 would be nice. nt greyl Dec 2011 #8
Agree with multiple hosts canetoad Dec 2011 #15
Yes. And I nominate you..nt SidDithers Dec 2011 #10
Yes, there should be hosts for this group Lithos Dec 2011 #14
I think this is the consensus. Anyone who feels otherwise, please speak up. Bolo Boffin Dec 2011 #16
My two cents... I suggest Bolo and Spooked Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #17
I'd be worried about assigning someone whose DU2 posts frequently clearly violated DU3's TOS. nt greyl Dec 2011 #20
Come on... Bolo was never that bad... Ohio Joe Dec 2011 #25
Probably not a good idea. canoeist52 Dec 2011 #18
If a group has no host, a thread CAN be alerted on. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2011 #19
Adding DUer known as noise to the "ballot". nt greyl Dec 2011 #21
If ever a group needed hosts this group would be my pick because.. Little Star Dec 2011 #23
I nominate you Bolo. Little Star Dec 2011 #24
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Does this group need a pe...»Reply #3