Creative Speculation

Midnight Writer

(23,339 posts)

8. I think Oswald could have mounted a very effective "reasonable doubt" defense.

Thu Apr 20, 2023, 09:17 PM

Apr 2023

And over 70 witnesses said Sirhan fired while 1 to 5 feet in front of RFK, yet the autopsy reported that RFK was shot three times in the back, including a wound behind his ear that had powder burns, indicating a shot fired from within an inch or so. No witnesses said Sirhan was at anytime behind Kennedy or within that close of range.

I don't know who killed either man, but I do know the investigations were seriously flawed. Evidence was mishandled, witnesses were bullied, and there was a lot of pressure to close these cases expediently.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

CIA Rogues and the Killing of the Kennedys: How and Why US Agents Conspired to Assassinate JFK & RFK [View all] milestogo Apr 2023 OP

I have serious doubts as to any conspiracy stories calguy Apr 2023 #1

Well I used to think 'conspiracy' meant there was a completely different narrative. milestogo Apr 2023 #2

Do you know whose bullet killed RFK? zipplewrath Apr 2023 #3

Are you asking me? milestogo Apr 2023 #4

How does that fit? zipplewrath Apr 2023 #6

So I can't recommend an audible book unless I have all the answers? milestogo Apr 2023 #7

I always thought it was a Mob hit n/t gay texan Apr 2023 #5

I think Oswald could have mounted a very effective "reasonable doubt" defense. Midnight Writer Apr 2023 #8

The coverup is always much more elaborate than the crime. milestogo Apr 2023 #9