Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dougolat

(716 posts)
14. Look who's talking, a believer in disappearing titanium engines!
Wed Sep 23, 2015, 03:30 AM
Sep 2015

Last edited Mon Sep 28, 2015, 12:53 AM - Edit history (1)

How quaint.
The BIG plane would make 3 circular holes on two floors but there's only one, suitable for either engine, leaving a lot to be accounted for: "No fit, sherlock!"
As a steady lurker since 2007, I'm aware of your dismissal of the P4T research that doesn't fit the fractured fairy-tale. but I was referring to the posts from OneSliceShort on that site, providing further analysis of the 239 Pentagon witnesses, only 41 of whom actually had physical locations capable of pinning down the north or south of Citgo question; from the helipad flight controller, Sean Boger, who saw the plane coming directly at him from north of Citgo, and ducked under his desk, yet claimed it hit (150 feet to his left, wrong trajectory for the internal damage), to Deb Anlauf in the Sheraton Hotel, who saw the jet close and directly overhead and flying on toward the Pentagon ( cited by some as viewing southward and indicating the south of Citgo flightpath, but incorrectly so).
But we're getting off in the weeds, and my gripe is not with you, rather the tag-team of abusive and vehement "skeptics" who make this group a dungeon. It's like dealing with creationists, or people who know about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and following Resolution, but refuse to acknowledge the criminality therein, maintaining that "all's fair in love and war."

Are you talking about the "official conspiracy theory" promoted by zappaman Sep 2015 #1
it isn't supported by science and facts! You just think it is. wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #2
Ever ask yourself why this 100% bullshit is only allowed in this nutty forum? Think about it. nt Logical Sep 2015 #16
That's nice. A lifetime hobby is a good thing. nt hack89 Sep 2015 #3
indeed! wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #4
With the end of the truth movement hack89 Sep 2015 #5
well i might think you're right... wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #6
Around here you are hack89 Sep 2015 #7
Repeating lies over and over again does not make them truth nationalize the fed Sep 2015 #8
I think hack89 is welcome here, considering that... AZCat Sep 2015 #9
Ahh yes we love us some skeptics - dougolat Sep 2015 #10
Oh you're a Pentagon no-planer? Wow... AZCat Sep 2015 #11
OH heavens! Imagine the temerity of actually intervewing the witnesses, dougolat Sep 2015 #12
Yeah, that's not really how it goes. AZCat Sep 2015 #13
Look who's talking, a believer in disappearing titanium engines! dougolat Sep 2015 #14
I think this is the real issue. AZCat Sep 2015 #15
Thank you, I'm sympathetic. And to continue with the Tonkin anology... dougolat Sep 2015 #17
The "real issue" is whether or not some of our so called leaders... wildbilln864 Oct 2015 #30
notice how he/she skirts that issue... wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #18
Skirts what issue bill? AZCat Sep 2015 #19
two engines/one hole! n/t wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #20
There was a 90 foot hole in the building hack89 Sep 2015 #21
90 foot hole in what building!? wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #22
You need to look beyond CT sites hack89 Sep 2015 #26
we have "talked about this for years." wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #27
"disintegrating on impact" wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #23
ah... wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #24
does your bedroom wall look like this? snooper2 Oct 2015 #28
pic! wildbilln864 Sep 2015 #25
Hey! Remember the subject if this thread was Alternative Theories? dougolat Oct 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»I support an alternative ...»Reply #14