Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
11. About the Dutch museum rock
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:10 PM
Aug 2015

Now, since nothing of value, in your world, has ever been stolen from a museum, what do you suppose is more likely:

1. The moon landing was faked, and the whole thing is now unraveled because the fakers made the rookie error of giving the museum what is easily determined to be of terrestrial origin.

Or

2. Somewhere along the line, someone - and most likely someone involved to some extent in the curation of this object - obtained possession of the original rock and replaced it with something unlikely to be looked at closely until that person's trail was well covered.

There are a lot of lunar samples in laboratories and collections around the world. Are all of these samples - some of them very well studied - also fakes, and this Dutch museum just simply the first one to notice?
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Creative Speculation»Wagging the Moondoggie»Reply #11