Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Israel/Palestine

Violet_Crumble

(36,139 posts)

3. I might be confused, but don't the admin or that MIR lot deal with TOS violations?

Reply to Lithos (Reply #1)

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 01:23 AM

Dec 2011

A jury just deals with the post itself and decides if it's a violation of the statement of purpose for the group. So if we alert on any posts here, we just point to the old guidelines (or hopefully a revised new flashy edition) and say it's against the statement of purpose?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

32 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Old I/P guidelines (for reference) [View all] Lithos Dec 2011 OP

At this point... Lithos Dec 2011 #1

I might be confused, but don't the admin or that MIR lot deal with TOS violations? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #3

A small future fact Lithos Dec 2011 #4

The same problem would affect quite a few groups I suspect... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #5

When you talk about RKBA Lithos Dec 2011 #6

I'm not good at acronyms. What's RKBA? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #11

The Right to Keep and Bear Arms oberliner Dec 2011 #12

Thanks. The K had me stumped... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #13

Question: WSSlover Apr 2019 #29

So are we on the honor system here? oberliner Dec 2011 #8

You should pin this thread.... Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #7

So then is the new I/P group pretty much exactly the same as the old one? Crunchy Frog Dec 2011 #9

LOL Lithos Dec 2011 #10

Are we supposed to give some input with a view to revising the old guidelines? Violet_Crumble Dec 2011 #14

Are these rules in effect? Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #15

the ones concerning content are Lithos Dec 2011 #16

OK...another quick question. Behind the Aegis Dec 2011 #17

Thanks for the Info gaelic Jan 2012 #18

I'm not very impressed with how the group has fared under the new system... Violet_Crumble Jun 2012 #19

I can't imagine a jury ever being effective in this group, honestly. Ruby the Liberal Jun 2012 #20

I was wondering yet again if there could be a look at sources LeftishBrit Jul 2012 #21

I'm going to second that request... Violet_Crumble Jul 2012 #22

Baffling hidden OP.... shira Aug 2012 #23

I'm curious. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #24

The history has always to allow material related to Israel and/or Palestine here Lithos Feb 2014 #25

The history doesn't seem to be supported by the I/P guidlnes. R. Daneel Olivaw Feb 2014 #26

To Lithos. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2014 #27

The rules are not deprecated and they still apply Lithos Aug 2014 #28

That response didn't date too well Violet_Crumble Oct 2023 #30

Hi, good to see you, my friend Lithos Oct 2023 #31

It's great to see you again, too Violet_Crumble Oct 2023 #32