Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Israel/Palestine
In reply to the discussion: UNESCO draft resolution: Western Wall is part of al-Aksa mosque [View all]Little Tich
(6,171 posts)35. Interestingly, I think you're the only one in the I/P group who denies that Israel was trying
to change the status quo on the Temple Mount. Here are two articles refuting your claim, and I can get more of the same if I want. If you have a single shred of evidence to back up your claim that Israel wasn't trying to change the status quo, please provide a link...
New bill would allow Jews to pray at Temple Mount
Source: Times of Israel, May 19, 2014
Likud, Labor lawmakers behind controversial initiative; regulations currently permit only Muslim worship in compound
Knesset members from the Likud and Labor parties are set to push forward a new bill that would allow Jews to pray at the Temple Mount, a practice currently forbidden.
The Temple Mount compound, which holds the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque, is considered the third holiest site in Islam and the holiest site to Jews as the site of the two ancient Jewish temples.
By law, under arrangements Israel instituted after capturing the area in 1967, Jews are not allowed to pray at the site.
MKs Miri Regev (Likud) and Hilik Bar (Labor) were expected to present the controversial bill for Knesset discussion, Ynet reported, but it is unclear when they will do so.
Knesset members from the Likud and Labor parties are set to push forward a new bill that would allow Jews to pray at the Temple Mount, a practice currently forbidden.
The Temple Mount compound, which holds the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque, is considered the third holiest site in Islam and the holiest site to Jews as the site of the two ancient Jewish temples.
By law, under arrangements Israel instituted after capturing the area in 1967, Jews are not allowed to pray at the site.
MKs Miri Regev (Likud) and Hilik Bar (Labor) were expected to present the controversial bill for Knesset discussion, Ynet reported, but it is unclear when they will do so.
Read more: http://www.timesofisrael.com/mks-propose-law-allowing-jews-to-pray-at-temple-mount/
Ministry looking to allow Jewish prayer on Temple Mount
Source: Times of Israel, April 30, 2014
Deputy religious affairs minister says he expects government to adopt new directives breaking longstanding taboo
The Religious Affairs Ministry is crafting new rules that would allow Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount, Deputy Minister Eli Ben Dahan said Tuesday.
We have drafted regulations that will regulate prayer on the mount, said Ben Dahan, of the nationalist Jewish Home party. I expect the prime minister and the government of Israel to adopt and validate these regulations and allow all Jews who desire so to go up to the Temple Mount and pray there, he told a conference of Liba, an organization that encourages Jews to visit the Temple Mount, via video address.
The regulations would reverse longstanding orders banning Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount. The rules have garnered backlash over the last several months amid a renewed interest in visiting the site by Jewish groups, which has served to stoke heated tensions at the site, holy to both Jews and Muslims.
Non-Muslim visitors seen prostrating or praying silently or openly have faced arrest by police for disturbing the peace.
Read more: http://www.timesofisrael.com/ministry-looking-to-allow-jewish-prayer-on-temple-mount/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"I find it fascinating that people still take that insane asylum called the UN seriously."
R. Daneel Olivaw
Oct 2015
#3
Bernie Sanders speaks thinks and has the same mannerisms as my dad and my uncles and friends
King_David
Oct 2015
#22
Yes, I am...waiting. What were you suggesting about Mondoweiss or BDS?
R. Daneel Olivaw
Oct 2015
#65
If you've ever read ATA on this subject then you would know that what you are suggesting
R. Daneel Olivaw
Oct 2015
#62
Combined time of the 1st and second temple...wherever they stood: 900 years
R. Daneel Olivaw
Oct 2015
#27
Since when are Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates...
Scootaloo
Oct 2015
#7
Where do you get your ideas from? Show us where Israel wants their treaty w/ Jordan.....
shira
Oct 2015
#31
up until the recent rise of revisionist Zionist Rabbi's , most traditional Rabbi's
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#39
This resolution wouldn't have seen the light of day if Israel hadn't tried to change the status quo
Little Tich
Oct 2015
#21
Interestingly, I think you're the only one in the I/P group who denies that Israel was trying
Little Tich
Oct 2015
#35
It was the protests and nothing else that stopped Israel from changing the status quo.
Little Tich
Oct 2015
#66
If democratic values make you nauseous, maybe you're posting in the wrong forum.
Little Tich
Nov 2015
#83
If you can't even understand your own argument, ther's nothing I can do... n/t
Little Tich
Nov 2015
#85
The UN is working exactly as it's supposed to since it's creation, and that's the problem.
aranthus
Oct 2015
#41
This is the resolution- it is at it's heart a cease and desist order for Israels actions wrt al aqsa
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#34
you hand us a 200+ page pdf were in nothing in the table of contents refers to the subject of this
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#37
18. Affirms that the Mughrabi Ascent is an integral and inseparable part of Al Aqsa Mosque/ Al-Haram
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#54
the only thing that 'confuses' me is why no one can produce a document with that wording
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#68
Yes it has and it passed I noted in the above post what was changed prior to being submitted
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#70
That's essentially an uncredited reprint of the article I posted, the resolution passed
azurnoir
Oct 2015
#72