Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,612 posts)
2. Sorry, that's incorrect.
Sat Oct 6, 2012, 11:53 AM
Oct 2012

Yes, it was a hydrogen explosion (though a couple of the nuts claim that it was a nuclear explosion... and more than a few gullible souls here have fallen for that nonsense)... but the hydrogen was only a problem because the fuel had already been exposed (causing the temperature to rise and the fuel cladding to produce the hydrogen). If they could keep the fuel covered that couldn't happen...

...but they couldn't keep the fuel covered because the pressure had risen too high for them to be able to inject enough water. Open the safety relief valve and lower the pressure... and now you can pump in more water.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Gross conceptual error. aandegoons Oct 2012 #1
Sorry, that's incorrect. FBaggins Oct 2012 #2
Your getting your timelines wrong. aandegoons Oct 2012 #3
Not at all. FBaggins Oct 2012 #4
WRONG!! PamW Oct 2012 #7
Militia Fury1952 Oct 2012 #5
Militia Fury1952 Oct 2012 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima Reactor 3 Explo...»Reply #2