Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(11,463 posts)
23. Oh, a conventional hybrid is definitely better than an ICE car as far as fuel efficiency and emissions
Sat Sep 14, 2024, 08:33 PM
Sep 14

The point I was making is that both the conventional (non-plug-in) hybrid and an ICE car get 100% of their energy from fossil fuels, and this is not the path to zero carbon emissions which is a necessary and soon according to the IPCC to avoid catastrophic climate impacts that make what we've been seeing the last 3 years a veritable Nirvana in comparison. From everything I read about climate and how much of U.S. energy is fossil fuel (about 83% IIRC), we're in dire straits, and making far too slow progress. Similarly on a world-wide basis. And actually not only net zero carbon emissions but we need NEGATIVE carbon emissions, as OKIsItJustMe has posted in an excerpt about a month ago. https://democraticunderground.com/1127175258 #12 and #14 and #16 (edited to add the #12 and #14 and #16) (And by carbon in the above I mean carbon and other greenhouse gasses like methane, or "carbon equivalent" ). Making incremental improvements in our fossil-fueled cars' efficiency is just not going to cut it. The atmospheric concentration of CO2 (and methane) is not only increasing, but increasing at an increasing rate (accelerating).

Back to the consumer level -- the conventional hybrid will be somewhat more expensive to buy than the equivalent ordinary ICE car. I believe that most people drive enough so that the conventional hybrid will be cheaper in the long run due to its considerably better mpg than the ICE car, overcoming its initial purchase cost disadvantage. (ICE car meaning gasoline or diesel fueled "Internal Combustion Engine" without any kind of electrical assistance beyond that provided by the 12 volt battery for sparking the spark plugs and lighting the lights and dashboard. Like what all cars were 30 years ago and many decades before that.)

I'm looking into buying a Toyota hybrid iemanja Sep 13 #1
Plug-in Hybrids - about 8 to 12 hours for a fully charge using ordinary 120 V circuit progree Sep 14 #11
It seems complicated iemanja Sep 14 #14
I test drove 2 Rav 4 hybrids today and I fell in love. 1WorldHope Sep 13 #2
I've been thinking about the Corolla Cross hybrid because it's smaller iemanja Sep 14 #15
I messed up my front end on my impreza subaru the first day i drove it. 1WorldHope Sep 14 #17
The first day iemanja Sep 14 #18
I was, but I never bothered fixing it because I kept doing it. 1WorldHope Sep 14 #25
Conventional hybrids get ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of their energy from gasoline (or diesel), so anyone progree Sep 13 #3
Those are the facts, yes. But the goal right now is for everyone reduce their carbon foot print. PortTack Sep 14 #5
I switched to EVs over a decade ago. NEVER going back. tinrobot Sep 14 #9
Happy that you like your EV. Here in the MW, cities like Chicago EV charging during cold weather can be an absolute PortTack Sep 14 #13
Ice cold Norway just passed 90% of new car sales as EVs. tinrobot Sep 14 #16
The average Norwegian drives 7600 miles per year NickB79 Sep 14 #20
Not really. 14K miles per year is only about 40 miles per day. tinrobot Sep 14 #27
This OP was about a stock Prius and a guy who got amazing mileage from it....NOT about EVs and your PortTack Sep 15 #29
I responded to the post immediately above me. tinrobot Sep 15 #39
Your chargers are burning natural gas and coal, but of course you didn't respond to that! PortTack Sep 16 #41
Don't forget, your toaster and TV set are also burning gas and coal. tinrobot Sep 16 #42
Are they no better than regular gasoline engines? iemanja Sep 14 #19
After I thought about it, but haven't verified: on Plug-in Hybrids -- progree Sep 14 #21
I'm talking about the difference between a combustible engine and a non-plug in hybrid iemanja Sep 14 #22
Oh, a conventional hybrid is definitely better than an ICE car as far as fuel efficiency and emissions progree Sep 14 #23
Okay, thanks. nt iemanja Sep 14 #24
Your welcome. Thanks for the questions. Good luck with your purchase 😊 /nt progree Sep 14 #26
I found something that's pretty good explanation of a conventional (non-plug-in) hybrid progree Sep 15 #28
What kind of hybrid is this? iemanja Sep 15 #34
I don't know - I'm not having any luck with your link progree Sep 15 #35
Is this better iemanja Sep 15 #36
Definitely a conventional (not plug-in) hybrid progree Sep 15 #37
Right, I knew that iemanja Sep 15 #38
One can pretend that electricity ISN'T generated overwhelmingly by fossil fuels at a huge thermodynamic penalty... NNadir Sep 15 #32
I'm well aware that the U.S. grid, on average, is 60% fossil fuel. What I'm saying is that progree Sep 15 #33
It is technically straight forward, although popularly not recognized or embraced to make ICE's nearly carbon neutral. NNadir Sep 15 #40
God, please don't get me stuck behind a hypermiler. NBachers Sep 14 #4
I've had two Prius...they are really great cars and I definitely have reduced my carbon foot print PortTack Sep 14 #6
I'm on my 2nd Prius chowmama Sep 14 #7
It's great that he did it, but the last part is basically a Toyota ad that slams EVs tinrobot Sep 14 #8
I've got a European spec Yaris Cross hybrid. shotten99 Sep 14 #10
It's not just the mileage that counts. My 12+ y/o Prius has had to have only Wonder Why Sep 14 #12
I'm saving my 12 yr old Prius for my daughter NickB79 Sep 15 #30
Mine goes to grandson in 2 years when he turns 16. Wonder Why Sep 15 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A Stock Toyota Prius Just...»Reply #23