Is emission-less propulsion possible? I believe it is...

[mikelewis]

56. Call me "Mikey Poopie Pants!"

Last edited Thu Dec 14, 2023, 09:50 AM - Edit history (2)

Here… let me help you. You are absolutely correct… completely… and since you can’t seem to refute the things I say with either math or logic… I give you this ultimate weapon!!!


See… when I was in the 5th grade, my mom used to change out the food in the vending machines at a local factory. We obviously weren’t the Rockafellers so you can imagine the less questionable food would come home with her. One morning, before school, I made the mistake of eating the wrong keilbasi dog and well… do I need to go on? Seriously, it’s embarassing enough and I’m thinking it’s the ammunition you need to win every argument against me… right? You win…

Never mind, the things you say are ridiculously wrong. Even the other 5th graders could be taught that forces combine when they collide in the same direction. I could set them in a chair that rolls and have them throw a ball at me and then never expect them to think that if I threw it back at them… they would return to the same position… but here’s the thing. If we did that experiment and they didn’t roll back into position… you can just discredit me by pointing and saying… “What does he know! It’s Mikey Poopie PANTS!!!” Right… You win…

Or… when we’re out on the school yard playing tetherball…. And I give them a thought experiment where they are playing it in space with a magnetic ball that strikes in the same spot over and over… you know… cause it’s tethered.

Now the 5th graders aren’t afraid of AI like you… they’re not intimidated at all by it. So weird.. right? So the 5th grader could actually be taught how to simulate that with AI and find out what would happen... to the pole and not the ball… (though you'll want to simulate two tetherball setups or it won't be pleasant) or they can just take your word for it. Remember, you’re telling them that an object that hits another object from the rear has to stop it, reverse the momentum and somehow drag it back into position.

Now, to give credit… at least the person with doctorate quoted me the correct equation… he was just quoting me the equation that has to do with the projectile… not the platform. The kenetic energy of the projectile will absolutely always equal zero… but who the fuck cares about the projectile? What is the ship doing?

And don’t take my word for it… Ask NASA… as I look up closed-loop pulse propulsion on Google…. Lots of new things are popping up… my guess is, NASA has been offsetting this annoyance for years and can’t figure out how to do much useful with it…

But what do I know, I’m a fiction writer, not a physicist… and I’m not a very good fiction writer either. My fiction is intended to be used as source code so other people can get AI to understand the closed-loop pulse propulsion concept. It is not meant to be taken seriously. I can say things implying electrons don’t have as much mass as an anvil… and say that incorrectly because I don’t actually give a shit. I assume you can figure out what I am saying on your own… This is a fictional story!

Here’s what you’re not seeing… I honestly don’t care how hateful and condescending you are to me… make as much fun of me as possible… I don’t care… But what I am watching is the view count… that view count means people are coming to these chats and copying and pasting what I say into AI because they can’t make it talk about closed-loop pulse propulsion on their own. They don’t understand the math…

Or maybe they do… maybe this is the story I am writing… who knows… I am just Mikey Poopie Pants… what the fuck do I know.