Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
1. Well, that's kind of hyperbolic
Thu Jun 5, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jun 2014

If you applied the same standard of cost accounting the the nation's 12 supercarriers, you would come up with a number an order of magnitude larger than the F-35. Heck, you'd probably have more than $1.45 trillion for the cost of developing, engineering, building, operating, manning, maintaining, reparing, transporting, and upgrading one super carrier, let alone twelve of them.

It's also a little wierd to be comparing the cost of developing, engineering, building, operating, manning, maintaining, reparing, transporting, and upgrading the F-35 to simply building the Interstate highway system. The proper comparison would include developing, engineering, operating, manning, maintaining, reparing and upgrading the Interstate system for its lifetime in addition to building it and would create a total cost probably far exceeding that $1.45 trillion cost of the F-35.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Poverty»Here's a Little Perspecti...»Reply #1