Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Oil Train Safety Megathread. Updated July 30, 2023 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(60,943 posts)60. PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement
Rail News Home Federal Legislation & Regulation 9/25/2018
Rail News: Federal Legislation & Regulation
PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) yesterday rescinded a mandate that would have required crude-oil trains to use electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) braking systems. ... The PHMSA took the action after it conducted a congressionally mandated review of the regulation's impact, and determined that the expected costs of requiring ECP brakes would be "significantly higher" than the expected benefits, according to a PHMSA press release. ... Rescinding the mandate does not affect the ability of railroads to use ECP brakes, PHMSA officials said.
ECP brakes issue electronic signals to simultaneously apply and release brakes throughout the length of a train instead of each car applying brakes individually a system some consider more effective in emergency situations.
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act required further analysis of the ECP brake requirements, including physical testing, to see how much more effective ECP brakes are in comparison to other brake systems. ... The FAST Act also required the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) to determine whether the ECP brake requirements were justified based on costs and benefits. The updated analysis which incorporated new findings from the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) testing of ECP braking systems determined that costs outweighed the benefits based on current economic conditions.
Efforts to repeal the implementation of ECP braking systems have been underway since the Trump administration took office in January 2017. In December 2017, the USDOT repealed a May 2015 FRA rulemaking that would have required the installation of ECP braking systems. ... In October 2016, the U.S. Government Accountability Office recommended that the USDOT acknowledge uncertainty in its revised economic analysis of ECP brakes, and collect data on railroads' use of the systems. Industry stakeholders such as the Association of American Railroads had claimed that the USDOT initially overestimated the benefits.
Rail News: Federal Legislation & Regulation
PHMSA pulls ECP brake requirement
The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) yesterday rescinded a mandate that would have required crude-oil trains to use electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) braking systems. ... The PHMSA took the action after it conducted a congressionally mandated review of the regulation's impact, and determined that the expected costs of requiring ECP brakes would be "significantly higher" than the expected benefits, according to a PHMSA press release. ... Rescinding the mandate does not affect the ability of railroads to use ECP brakes, PHMSA officials said.
ECP brakes issue electronic signals to simultaneously apply and release brakes throughout the length of a train instead of each car applying brakes individually a system some consider more effective in emergency situations.
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act required further analysis of the ECP brake requirements, including physical testing, to see how much more effective ECP brakes are in comparison to other brake systems. ... The FAST Act also required the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) to determine whether the ECP brake requirements were justified based on costs and benefits. The updated analysis which incorporated new findings from the Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) testing of ECP braking systems determined that costs outweighed the benefits based on current economic conditions.
Efforts to repeal the implementation of ECP braking systems have been underway since the Trump administration took office in January 2017. In December 2017, the USDOT repealed a May 2015 FRA rulemaking that would have required the installation of ECP braking systems. ... In October 2016, the U.S. Government Accountability Office recommended that the USDOT acknowledge uncertainty in its revised economic analysis of ECP brakes, and collect data on railroads' use of the systems. Industry stakeholders such as the Association of American Railroads had claimed that the USDOT initially overestimated the benefits.
PHMSA Rescinds ECP Brake Mandate After RIA Finds Costs Outweigh Benefits
Monday, September 24, 2018
The U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) today finalized amendments to the Hazardous Materials Regulations which remove the requirement, while still allowing, for certain High Hazard Flammable Unit Trains (HHFUT) to operate using electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) braking systems. The Department's action is based on a Congressional requirement to conduct an updated Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). The Department's analysis shows that the expected costs of requiring ECP brakes would be significantly higher than the expected benefits of the requirement. This regulatory change does not affect the ability of a railroad to implement ECP brakes.
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act required further analysis of the ECP brake requirements, including physical testing, to improve general knowledge and understanding of how much more effective ECP brakes are in comparison to other brake systems. It also required DOT to determine whether the ECP brake requirements are justified based on the expected costs and benefits. The updated RIA incorporated new findings from ECP brake testing conducted by the Federal Railroad Administration, which were reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. The updated RIA also incorporated recommendations from U.S. Government Accountability Office, and updated costs and benefits of the ECP brake provision based on current economic conditions. The updated RIA found that the expected costs of ECP brakes are significantly higher than the expected benefits, and therefore the FAST Act required DOT to repeal the ECP brake requirement.
For more details, the Department's Final Rule announcing its decision, along with the final updated RIA that responds to comments received, are available for review at http://www.regulations.gov in Docket Number PHMSA-2017-0102.
Updated: Monday, September 24, 2018
Monday, September 24, 2018
The U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) today finalized amendments to the Hazardous Materials Regulations which remove the requirement, while still allowing, for certain High Hazard Flammable Unit Trains (HHFUT) to operate using electronically controlled pneumatic (ECP) braking systems. The Department's action is based on a Congressional requirement to conduct an updated Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA). The Department's analysis shows that the expected costs of requiring ECP brakes would be significantly higher than the expected benefits of the requirement. This regulatory change does not affect the ability of a railroad to implement ECP brakes.
The Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act required further analysis of the ECP brake requirements, including physical testing, to improve general knowledge and understanding of how much more effective ECP brakes are in comparison to other brake systems. It also required DOT to determine whether the ECP brake requirements are justified based on the expected costs and benefits. The updated RIA incorporated new findings from ECP brake testing conducted by the Federal Railroad Administration, which were reviewed by the National Academy of Sciences. The updated RIA also incorporated recommendations from U.S. Government Accountability Office, and updated costs and benefits of the ECP brake provision based on current economic conditions. The updated RIA found that the expected costs of ECP brakes are significantly higher than the expected benefits, and therefore the FAST Act required DOT to repeal the ECP brake requirement.
For more details, the Department's Final Rule announcing its decision, along with the final updated RIA that responds to comments received, are available for review at http://www.regulations.gov in Docket Number PHMSA-2017-0102.
Updated: Monday, September 24, 2018
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The stuff was getting scattered. I was impressed by progree's analysis
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2015
#2
One year after Lynchburg train wreck, booming Bakken still fuels concerns
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2015
#12
EIA: Rail delivered 52 percent of East Coast refinery supply in February
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#14
FRA freezes on tank car sloshing; DOE oil volatility bombshell drops like a dud
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#20
Vancouver (Washington) Columbian Three-Part Series About Port Oil Terminal Deal
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#22
UW-Madison researchers hope frac-sand impact study will help railroads improve ballast maintenance
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2015
#26
Canadian Pacific asks judge not to approve Lac-Megantic derailment settlement
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2015
#29
FRA Announces Final Rule to Prevent Unattended Trains from Rolling Away
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2015
#32
Federal Railroad Administration to RRs: Notification of Crude Oil Trains to States Must Continue
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2015
#33
Officials: Broken rail missed on 2 inspections caused fiery West Va. train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2015
#34
Federal Railroad Administration Issues Final Rule to Improve Rail Flaw Detection {January 2014}
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2015
#36
Washington state transportation commission adopts crude-by-rail safety rules
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2016
#45
NTSB report: Broken rail likely caused 2014 Lynchburg train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2016
#46
Minnesota legislators want railroads to open books on emergency response
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2016
#47
Oil-by-rail safety concerns likely to reignite after Oregon derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#49
2 ND rail inspectors receive certification from the Federal Railroad Administration
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2016
#51
NTSB releases dashcam videos of December 30, 2013, Casselton, North Dakota, oil train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2017
#52
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#53
National Academy Study Touts Oil-by-Rail Safety But Supports Weakening Regulations
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
#55
Tar Sands Crude Shipments Quietly Increased In Oregon, With Regulators In the Dark
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#66
Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2019
#67
BNSF says it can handle more crude-by-rail shipments if Dakota pipeline is shut
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2021
#70
Moffat Tunnel lease could become part of fight over Uinta Basin Railway
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#74
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
#76