Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Economy
In reply to the discussion: Oil Train Safety Megathread. Updated July 30, 2023 [View all]mahatmakanejeeves
(60,944 posts)28. Full NJ Senate to vote on rules for oil trains
Hat tip, Lackawanna484 at Trainorders: Eastern Railroad Discussion > NJ Senate to vote on new oil train rules
Full NJ Senate to vote on rules for oil trains
June 15, 2015, 12:19 PM
Last updated: Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 7:46 AM
By JAMES M. ONEILL
staff writer | The Record
A package of bills designed to improve the safe operation of freight trains that transport millions of gallons of volatile crude oil through North Jersey every week passed a state Senate committee Monday and now moves to the full Senate for a vote.
One of the bills would require the owner or operator of such trains to submit plans to the state Department of Environmental Protection detailing how the company would clean up any spill. The plans would have to be renewed every five years. ... The rail companies would also be required to offer training to emergency responders in each town along the rail route, and also provide the DEP with proof that the rail company has the financial means to clean up a spill and remove any damaged or disabled train equipment carrying hazardous materials.
Related: More work needed to shore up Oradell Reservoir bridge used by oil trains
The bill also tries to require more public notice of train cargo and movements to address what many in North Jersey have expressed deep concern about the lack of information about the train shipments and the materials being sent along the lines. However, its not clear how successful this effort would be because new federal regulations make such information all but impossible for the public to obtain.
The bill would require each rail company to make available on its website information about the routes and volumes of cargo to the extent the information does not conflict with federal law. The information must be updated on a monthly basis. The websites should also provide an analysis of the consequences of a major spill along the rail line, the current level of catastrophic insurance coverage carried by each company and a copy of the companys most current cleanup plan.
Last updated: Tuesday, June 16, 2015, 7:46 AM
By JAMES M. ONEILL
staff writer | The Record
A package of bills designed to improve the safe operation of freight trains that transport millions of gallons of volatile crude oil through North Jersey every week passed a state Senate committee Monday and now moves to the full Senate for a vote.
One of the bills would require the owner or operator of such trains to submit plans to the state Department of Environmental Protection detailing how the company would clean up any spill. The plans would have to be renewed every five years. ... The rail companies would also be required to offer training to emergency responders in each town along the rail route, and also provide the DEP with proof that the rail company has the financial means to clean up a spill and remove any damaged or disabled train equipment carrying hazardous materials.
Related: More work needed to shore up Oradell Reservoir bridge used by oil trains
The bill also tries to require more public notice of train cargo and movements to address what many in North Jersey have expressed deep concern about the lack of information about the train shipments and the materials being sent along the lines. However, its not clear how successful this effort would be because new federal regulations make such information all but impossible for the public to obtain.
The bill would require each rail company to make available on its website information about the routes and volumes of cargo to the extent the information does not conflict with federal law. The information must be updated on a monthly basis. The websites should also provide an analysis of the consequences of a major spill along the rail line, the current level of catastrophic insurance coverage carried by each company and a copy of the companys most current cleanup plan.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
76 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The stuff was getting scattered. I was impressed by progree's analysis
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2015
#2
One year after Lynchburg train wreck, booming Bakken still fuels concerns
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2015
#12
EIA: Rail delivered 52 percent of East Coast refinery supply in February
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#14
FRA freezes on tank car sloshing; DOE oil volatility bombshell drops like a dud
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#20
Vancouver (Washington) Columbian Three-Part Series About Port Oil Terminal Deal
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2015
#22
UW-Madison researchers hope frac-sand impact study will help railroads improve ballast maintenance
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2015
#26
Canadian Pacific asks judge not to approve Lac-Megantic derailment settlement
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2015
#29
FRA Announces Final Rule to Prevent Unattended Trains from Rolling Away
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2015
#32
Federal Railroad Administration to RRs: Notification of Crude Oil Trains to States Must Continue
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2015
#33
Officials: Broken rail missed on 2 inspections caused fiery West Va. train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2015
#34
Federal Railroad Administration Issues Final Rule to Improve Rail Flaw Detection {January 2014}
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2015
#36
Washington state transportation commission adopts crude-by-rail safety rules
mahatmakanejeeves
Feb 2016
#45
NTSB report: Broken rail likely caused 2014 Lynchburg train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2016
#46
Minnesota legislators want railroads to open books on emergency response
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2016
#47
Oil-by-rail safety concerns likely to reignite after Oregon derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Jun 2016
#49
2 ND rail inspectors receive certification from the Federal Railroad Administration
mahatmakanejeeves
Oct 2016
#51
NTSB releases dashcam videos of December 30, 2013, Casselton, North Dakota, oil train derailment
mahatmakanejeeves
Mar 2017
#52
Wilmington News Journal - Delaware Online: Rail safety questioned as fuel shipments likely to go up
mahatmakanejeeves
May 2017
#53
National Academy Study Touts Oil-by-Rail Safety But Supports Weakening Regulations
mahatmakanejeeves
Nov 2017
#55
Tar Sands Crude Shipments Quietly Increased In Oregon, With Regulators In the Dark
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2019
#66
Hazardous Materials: Washington Crude Oil By Rail-Vapor Pressure Requirements
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 2019
#67
BNSF says it can handle more crude-by-rail shipments if Dakota pipeline is shut
mahatmakanejeeves
Apr 2021
#70
Moffat Tunnel lease could become part of fight over Uinta Basin Railway
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2023
#74
6 months after the East Palestine train derailment, Congress is deadlocked on new rules for safety
BumRushDaShow
Aug 2023
#76