Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

radicalliberal

(907 posts)
14. I'm not sure I'd ever take my cue from you.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 03:10 PM
Jul 2013

Last edited Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:44 PM - Edit history (5)

One of the traditional supposed measures of masculinity has been participation in sports. That particular little item is even specifically mentioned by Katz in his description of the "narrow box." Do you favor stigmatizing boys who have no interest in sports as wimps or "feminized" males? Do you favor the bullying of nonathletic boys? After all, they represent a departure from the "norms" of supposed "masculinity."

You talk about strength. What about moral courage? Did physical strength play any role at all in the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, or was it driven by moral courage?

I don't believe in blending the sexes. There are differences between men and women, aside from the "plumbing." But you seem to be advocating machismo, which I detest completely. I grew up with machismo and learned all about it before I even heard the word. I had my fill of it!

Listening to Men's Rights Advocates and other guys, you'd think all men's problems were caused by women. Well, as far as I'm concerned, many of them have been caused by other men! Machismo has caused more misery in my life than anything else. Some, if not much, of this misery is of a personal nature and obviously cannot be discussed in a public forum such as this one. It took me decades to realize just how phony and wrong machismo is. If I sound angry, it's because I am!

I never expected Jackson Katz to be attacked in a progressive forum. I'd expect this sort of reaction in a conservative or reactionary website.

Katz is not the problem. He's just a reformer like Joe Ehrmann. He's all right by me.

Yes and no. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2011 #1
Don't throw out the baby with the bathwater, so to speak. I certainly don't disagree with that. nomorenomore08 Jul 2013 #20
So can I come into the Feminists group and post a video of what I think women should be like? Warren DeMontague Dec 2011 #2
Let me answer that -- no. nt. mistertrickster Feb 2012 #12
+ 1000 opiate69 Feb 2012 #13
good point, not sure anybody has the rights answers when it comes to stuff like this loli phabay Jul 2013 #15
+1 nomorenomore08 Jul 2013 #21
Crap, I can't even get along with -myself-, some days. Warren DeMontague Jul 2013 #30
i cant even go there. I was a big meanie! galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #19
lol.. join the club... opiate69 Jul 2013 #22
he is a saint with the gift of patience, to be sure. nt galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #25
Bwahahaha! lumberjack_jeff Jul 2013 #31
I watched it dipsydoodle Dec 2011 #3
Its so much more than just violence that needs to be addressed. HuskiesHowls Dec 2011 #4
"where males are taught from little up that they have to be the provider" ISNT paternalistic galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #27
Good point!! HuskiesHowls Jul 2013 #43
This is tough to believe Doctor_J Jul 2013 #38
As a society, we are taught violence wins. HuskiesHowls Jul 2013 #44
Jackson Katz is full of it.. Upton Dec 2011 #5
The world is changing. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2011 #6
The world may be changing.. Upton Dec 2011 #7
What "attributes" are you talking about? plantwomyn Dec 2011 #8
What to attribute the "seeming acceptance of violence against women and children"? lumberjack_jeff Dec 2011 #9
You state that the "operative phrase is "seeming" plantwomyn Dec 2011 #10
"women's responsibility for teaching sons and... the men around them" lumberjack_jeff Dec 2011 #11
pretty sure the last people i would want advising me are the extreme feminists loli phabay Jul 2013 #16
I'm not sure I'd ever take my cue from you. radicalliberal Jul 2013 #14
mens problems are caused by men listening to bullshit like this. galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #18
Nonathletic boys' problems are caused by those who tell them that they're less manly . . . radicalliberal Jul 2013 #26
ah, man you seem cool and I'm not trying to down you. i respect your experience. galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #28
Thank you very much for the kind compliments. :) radicalliberal Jul 2013 #33
I think you're conflating machismo and masculinity unfairly. lumberjack_jeff Jul 2013 #32
You've made a good point. :) radicalliberal Jul 2013 #34
^ Wall of truth Dash87 Jul 2013 #36
I agree! Do you know what's ludicrous? radicalliberal Jul 2013 #40
Attack of the zombie thread!!! opiate69 Jul 2013 #41
Excellent! lol radicalliberal Jul 2013 #42
great example of a "nice guy" attempting to engender himself to the ladies (and get laid) galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #17
I guess I'm not quite so cynical about it. I believe his intentions are good, but as you put it nomorenomore08 Jul 2013 #23
i totally understand and appreciate your view galileoreloaded Jul 2013 #24
I do think there's a good bit of truth to what you just said. nomorenomore08 Jul 2013 #29
Not really... rrneck Jul 2013 #35
+1000. A must-see TED talk. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2013 #39
That reminds me. I haven't watched Hard Target in probably a year Doctor_J Jul 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»Tough Guise: Violence, Me...»Reply #14