Let's talk about "Coercive Sex".

[Major Nikon]

44. Farrell's book came out 5 years later

Imagine that. I'm also not entirely sure how 2013 minus 1988 equals a "nearly 40-year-old-study".

So do you really think that a more relevant study that asks the same question has come out since, or are you just demonstrating your ignorance of what a study does and does not do? Competent studies do not expire regardless of what you think. Studies dating back 100 years are more are still being referenced quite competently by people who actually do know squat about studies. Your choices here are you can either provide a more relevant study that asks the same or very similar questions or you can argue with yourself. This isn't my first rodeo with you on this subject and I'm not going to have you demand an endless source of cites from me while you provide squat of your own. You've already demonstrated a considerable amount of ignorance regarding what makes a study valid or not and I'm just not going to play whack-a-mole with you ad nauseum until I just stop replying and you self-declare victory after having the last word. Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

I quoted Farrell to demonstrate the fallacy of quoting someone out of context. As I said, the only thing I did was poke holes in those who made a piss-poor case against Farrell. I'm sure you think I'm afraid of you for continuing to repost your half-fast meritless accusations, but I can assure you I'm not. If I were, I'd simply use the famous trick of deleting the post and pretend it never happened. I'm sure you've heard of it. Instead I'd rather just offer relevant information that definitively proves you're simply an irrelevant gasbag for bringing it up repeatedly.

I also find it quite telling how you would try and associate me with a person I've never heard of and a web site I've never visited, after spending years cheerleading for a no-shit misandrist and even sig line linking to her site which also included this shit. After the last time I called you on it, I noticed you removed the link from your sig line for whatever reason. I guess you thought I had forgotten. I'll also remind you that Iverglas, who was a no-shit hater of the first degree who got banned for transphobia and other assorted hate filled rhetoric, was defended by you and others on this site. The next time you're trying to make a case for a hater based on guilt-by-association horse feathers, please don't forget that, because I won't and I will call you on it every time you choose to try and defame me based on nonsense. Glass houses and shit...

Cheers!