Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
36. Can we cut to the chase and just call them assholes? A neutral...
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 02:56 AM
Oct 2012

non-sexist term that correctly identifies them as fucking idiots? Or non-fucking idiots as the case may be.

Or, is it impossible for a woman to be an asshole?

The penis as a terrorism device [View all] Major Nikon Oct 2012 OP
Holy shit she found us out! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #1
Well, I that guy Rinsed Penis is a terrorist in my book. I don't care how clean he keeps it. OffWithTheirHeads Oct 2012 #2
You mean Reese's Pubis? Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #4
I assume that capitalization and punctuation are also part of a paternalistic conspiracy. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #3
Capitalization supports the patriarchal dominance structure 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #7
+ a brazillion opiate69 Oct 2012 #8
They were still women back when I was in college. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #9
Clearly, an intervention is needed. opiate69 Oct 2012 #10
Too late! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #11
I thought it was just that the caps lock button at the library was broken. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #13
Ba-Zing! hifiguy Oct 2012 #29
Holy crap! HappyMe Oct 2012 #5
Color me confused. Goblinmonger Oct 2012 #6
They dont REALLY like it, they just think they do. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #12
It's like if you get a tooth pulled 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #14
The comments are hilarious/frightening 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #15
Not surprisingly, one of the usual suspects was quick to defend it Major Nikon Oct 2012 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #17
When they start ranting against the horrors of PIV sex 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #18
It's hard to consider the term "radfems" as a pejorative Major Nikon Oct 2012 #27
I've been getting word of a lot of 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #28
It is the Term They Used Macoy51 Oct 2012 #30
Can we cut to the chase and just call them assholes? A neutral... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #36
Ah but asshole is nonspecific 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #38
And of course, they banned you even though one of their members violated their own SOP first stevenleser Oct 2012 #19
I don't think it should be disbanded Major Nikon Oct 2012 #31
I think the group and its members have descended into a form of wingnuttery, ie outside the TOS stevenleser Oct 2012 #32
I think that shining some daylight into the issue helps. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #33
One thing to consider is they need pressure relief Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #39
Limiting the total number of users a forum may ban 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #35
Here's a good one: ("Seen On DU™") Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #20
Apparently saying one should be free to watch porn 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #21
They have definitely crossed the line into seperatist feminism with this anti-PIV stuff. stevenleser Oct 2012 #22
I have been told quite emphatically 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #23
Their view boils down to, the penis is evil, and people with penises who want sex are evil... stevenleser Oct 2012 #24
I especially like the bit 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #25
Yes, it's hard not to make obvious assumptions about who the target of this virulent diatribe is Major Nikon Oct 2012 #26
I tell you what Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #34
I read as much as I could of that mess, but what I really don't understand out of all of it... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #37
if you've ever been married you'd understand the impossible Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #40
I have had such girlfriends... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The penis as a terrorism ...»Reply #36