Men's Group

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)

35. Limiting the total number of users a forum may ban

Sun Oct 21, 2012, 02:55 PM

Oct 2012

might be a good idea.

One or two, ok they were probably just causing trouble.

20+? Yeah, that's a clear attempt to generate an echo-chamber and silence dissent.

If the HoF were open and actually had to defend their views the whole system would collapse under the weight of reason and mockery.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The penis as a terrorism device [View all] Major Nikon Oct 2012 OP

Holy shit she found us out! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #1

Well, I that guy Rinsed Penis is a terrorist in my book. I don't care how clean he keeps it. OffWithTheirHeads Oct 2012 #2

You mean Reese's Pubis? Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #4

I assume that capitalization and punctuation are also part of a paternalistic conspiracy. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #3

Capitalization supports the patriarchal dominance structure 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #7

+ a brazillion opiate69 Oct 2012 #8

They were still women back when I was in college. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #9

Clearly, an intervention is needed. opiate69 Oct 2012 #10

Too late! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #11

I thought it was just that the caps lock button at the library was broken. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #13

Ba-Zing! hifiguy Oct 2012 #29

Holy crap! HappyMe Oct 2012 #5

Color me confused. Goblinmonger Oct 2012 #6

They dont REALLY like it, they just think they do. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #12

It's like if you get a tooth pulled 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #14

The comments are hilarious/frightening 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #15

Not surprisingly, one of the usual suspects was quick to defend it Major Nikon Oct 2012 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #17

When they start ranting against the horrors of PIV sex 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #18

It's hard to consider the term "radfems" as a pejorative Major Nikon Oct 2012 #27

I've been getting word of a lot of 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #28

It is the Term They Used Macoy51 Oct 2012 #30

Can we cut to the chase and just call them assholes? A neutral... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #36

Ah but asshole is nonspecific 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #38

And of course, they banned you even though one of their members violated their own SOP first stevenleser Oct 2012 #19

I don't think it should be disbanded Major Nikon Oct 2012 #31

I think the group and its members have descended into a form of wingnuttery, ie outside the TOS stevenleser Oct 2012 #32

I think that shining some daylight into the issue helps. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #33

One thing to consider is they need pressure relief Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #39

Limiting the total number of users a forum may ban 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #35

Here's a good one: ("Seen On DU™") Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #20

Apparently saying one should be free to watch porn 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #21

They have definitely crossed the line into seperatist feminism with this anti-PIV stuff. stevenleser Oct 2012 #22

I have been told quite emphatically 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #23

Their view boils down to, the penis is evil, and people with penises who want sex are evil... stevenleser Oct 2012 #24

I especially like the bit 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #25

Yes, it's hard not to make obvious assumptions about who the target of this virulent diatribe is Major Nikon Oct 2012 #26

I tell you what Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #34

I read as much as I could of that mess, but what I really don't understand out of all of it... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #37

if you've ever been married you'd understand the impossible Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #40

I have had such girlfriends... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #41