Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

4th law of robotics

(6,801 posts)
15. The comments are hilarious/frightening
Mon Oct 15, 2012, 04:38 PM
Oct 2012
They need us alive, until they take reproductive technology to the point where they don’t. In Japan men already use dolls and shit instead of real women for sex.


This is commonly referred to as "projection".

ah, which makes it completely obvious what “sex” really is to men and to the p, which is “men sticking their dicks into objects.” Inflatable rafts, bicycles, cars, knotholes, whevs. When this is done to women, women are the objects. This cannot be remedied, and the language men use to describe all of these things, (sex) gives the entire game away.


Yes but you're only allowed to have sex with your own inflatable raft. The patriarchy is quite clear on this: put your dick in to any object you wish but make sure you own it first.

Yesterday I had to take a family member for a test at a hospital radiology clinic. Every where it seems, there were warning signs for pregnant women and women who “might” be pregnant. Was so glad none of this applied to me, or was anything I even had to worry about. But I did wonder how many women did feel fear when they saw such signs.


I guess we should take those signs down so some women don't feel afraid?

all my PIV posts are about cost-benefit analyses, really, and how PIV is never worth the risk, for women. and how mens active desire to harm women, and the ways men actively and passively benefit from harming women fits into all of this for men, and is part of the cost-benefit analysis for men. we all do these analyses all the time, but its never talked about, and mens reality, and what women stand to lose if they dont cater to it, carries the day always.


It's true. Every time I've down my Cost/Benefit of having sex with me powerpoint in the bedroom my wife was severely turned off. (I had graphs and a laser pointer and everything)

Remember that bedroom scene from “What women want” where Marissa Tomei is thinking about how utterly boring it is?

If there is no genuine exchange of real love between the people, and there isn’t between man/woman couples, that eliminates the whole point of the act for me.


Wait, it's men who are supposed to get unrealistic thoughts about sex from videos (porn) not women.



The penis as a terrorism device [View all] Major Nikon Oct 2012 OP
Holy shit she found us out! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #1
Well, I that guy Rinsed Penis is a terrorist in my book. I don't care how clean he keeps it. OffWithTheirHeads Oct 2012 #2
You mean Reese's Pubis? Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #4
I assume that capitalization and punctuation are also part of a paternalistic conspiracy. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #3
Capitalization supports the patriarchal dominance structure 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #7
+ a brazillion opiate69 Oct 2012 #8
They were still women back when I was in college. DavidDvorkin Oct 2012 #9
Clearly, an intervention is needed. opiate69 Oct 2012 #10
Too late! 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #11
I thought it was just that the caps lock button at the library was broken. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #13
Ba-Zing! hifiguy Oct 2012 #29
Holy crap! HappyMe Oct 2012 #5
Color me confused. Goblinmonger Oct 2012 #6
They dont REALLY like it, they just think they do. Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #12
It's like if you get a tooth pulled 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #14
The comments are hilarious/frightening 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #15
Not surprisingly, one of the usual suspects was quick to defend it Major Nikon Oct 2012 #16
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #17
When they start ranting against the horrors of PIV sex 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #18
It's hard to consider the term "radfems" as a pejorative Major Nikon Oct 2012 #27
I've been getting word of a lot of 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #28
It is the Term They Used Macoy51 Oct 2012 #30
Can we cut to the chase and just call them assholes? A neutral... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #36
Ah but asshole is nonspecific 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #38
And of course, they banned you even though one of their members violated their own SOP first stevenleser Oct 2012 #19
I don't think it should be disbanded Major Nikon Oct 2012 #31
I think the group and its members have descended into a form of wingnuttery, ie outside the TOS stevenleser Oct 2012 #32
I think that shining some daylight into the issue helps. lumberjack_jeff Oct 2012 #33
One thing to consider is they need pressure relief Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #39
Limiting the total number of users a forum may ban 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #35
Here's a good one: ("Seen On DU™") Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #20
Apparently saying one should be free to watch porn 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #21
They have definitely crossed the line into seperatist feminism with this anti-PIV stuff. stevenleser Oct 2012 #22
I have been told quite emphatically 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #23
Their view boils down to, the penis is evil, and people with penises who want sex are evil... stevenleser Oct 2012 #24
I especially like the bit 4th law of robotics Oct 2012 #25
Yes, it's hard not to make obvious assumptions about who the target of this virulent diatribe is Major Nikon Oct 2012 #26
I tell you what Warren DeMontague Oct 2012 #34
I read as much as I could of that mess, but what I really don't understand out of all of it... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #37
if you've ever been married you'd understand the impossible Hemp_is_good Oct 2012 #40
I have had such girlfriends... TreasonousBastard Oct 2012 #41
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Men's Group»The penis as a terrorism ...»Reply #15