Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Men's Group
In reply to the discussion: The penis as a terrorism device [View all]4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)15. The comments are hilarious/frightening
They need us alive, until they take reproductive technology to the point where they dont. In Japan men already use dolls and shit instead of real women for sex.
This is commonly referred to as "projection".
ah, which makes it completely obvious what sex really is to men and to the p, which is men sticking their dicks into objects. Inflatable rafts, bicycles, cars, knotholes, whevs. When this is done to women, women are the objects. This cannot be remedied, and the language men use to describe all of these things, (sex) gives the entire game away.
Yes but you're only allowed to have sex with your own inflatable raft. The patriarchy is quite clear on this: put your dick in to any object you wish but make sure you own it first.
Yesterday I had to take a family member for a test at a hospital radiology clinic. Every where it seems, there were warning signs for pregnant women and women who might be pregnant. Was so glad none of this applied to me, or was anything I even had to worry about. But I did wonder how many women did feel fear when they saw such signs.
I guess we should take those signs down so some women don't feel afraid?
all my PIV posts are about cost-benefit analyses, really, and how PIV is never worth the risk, for women. and how mens active desire to harm women, and the ways men actively and passively benefit from harming women fits into all of this for men, and is part of the cost-benefit analysis for men. we all do these analyses all the time, but its never talked about, and mens reality, and what women stand to lose if they dont cater to it, carries the day always.
It's true. Every time I've down my Cost/Benefit of having sex with me powerpoint in the bedroom my wife was severely turned off. (I had graphs and a laser pointer and everything)
Remember that bedroom scene from What women want where Marissa Tomei is thinking about how utterly boring it is?
If there is no genuine exchange of real love between the people, and there isnt between man/woman couples, that eliminates the whole point of the act for me.
Wait, it's men who are supposed to get unrealistic thoughts about sex from videos (porn) not women.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, I that guy Rinsed Penis is a terrorist in my book. I don't care how clean he keeps it.
OffWithTheirHeads
Oct 2012
#2
I assume that capitalization and punctuation are also part of a paternalistic conspiracy.
DavidDvorkin
Oct 2012
#3
I thought it was just that the caps lock button at the library was broken.
Warren DeMontague
Oct 2012
#13
And of course, they banned you even though one of their members violated their own SOP first
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#19
I think the group and its members have descended into a form of wingnuttery, ie outside the TOS
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#32
They have definitely crossed the line into seperatist feminism with this anti-PIV stuff.
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#22
Their view boils down to, the penis is evil, and people with penises who want sex are evil...
stevenleser
Oct 2012
#24
Yes, it's hard not to make obvious assumptions about who the target of this virulent diatribe is
Major Nikon
Oct 2012
#26
I read as much as I could of that mess, but what I really don't understand out of all of it...
TreasonousBastard
Oct 2012
#37